You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Pelosi: At-risk Dems can back drilling - Save the Planet and the Dems
2008-08-05
California Democrat Nancy Pelosi may be trying to save the planet — but the rank and file in her party increasingly are just trying to save their political hides when it comes to gas prices as Republicans apply more and more rhetorical muscle.

But what looks like intraparty tension on the surface is part of an intentional strategy in which Pelosi takes the heat on energy policy, while behind the scenes sheÂ’s encouraging vulnerable Democrats to express their independence if it helps them politically, according to Democratic aides on and off Capitol Hill.

Pelosi’s gambit rests on one big assumption: that Democrats will own Washington after the election and will be able to craft a sweeping energy policy that is heavy on conservation and fuel alternatives while allowing for some new oil drilling. Democrats see no need to make major concessions on energy policy with a party poised to lose seats in both chambers in just three months — even if recess-averse Republicans continue to pound away on the issue.

“The reality is we will have a new president in three months, and what Bush and the Republicans are trying to do amounts to a land grab for the oil companies,” said one senior House Democratic aide involved with party strategy. “I don’t think we have to give in at all pre-election — we have many more options postelection.”

ItÂ’s a reality that Rep. Nick J. Rahall (D-W.Va.) personally delivered to President Bush recently.

Rahall spent more than an hour last week talking to the president about energy. Bush spent the entire flight aboard Air Force One, and much of a subsequent limousine ride, grilling the West Virginia Democrat about legislative solutions to the high price of gasoline, Rahall said last week.

So, does the president think Congress can get anything done this year?

“No,” Rahall replied in a short interview with Politico. “He’s realistic about it.”

Asked if Congress will produce a comprehensive energy bill in September before Congress adjourns again for elections, Rahall replied, “This year? No.”

Instead, the chairman of the House Committee on Natural Resources believes Democrats are all about 2009.

“We’ve laid the groundwork this year,” Rahall said.

Democratic House aides say the energy agenda has been carefully gamed out in strategy sessions, and Pelosi always intended to take heat on gas prices while tacitly encouraging more vulnerable Democrats to publicly disagree with her and show their independence.

Freshman Democrats like Jason Altmire of Pennsylvania and Don Cazayoux of Louisiana have taken her up on the offer.

Altmire has said a drilling vote “will happen,” while Cazayoux, hoping to hang on to his seat in a conservative Baton Rouge-area district, on Friday sent a letter to Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) demanding a vote on more domestic oil exploration.

“There will be a vote,” said Altmire, who faces a rematch with former GOP Rep. Melissa Hart this fall in the Pittsburgh suburbs.

Indeed, Congress must vote before Sept. 30 to renew the annual moratorium; otherwise, it will lapse on its own, giving states the right to decide whether private companies can search for potential drilling sites three miles offshore. .

Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#6  Considering gas cost an arm and a leg TODAY and 2009 is PIE IN THE SKY.... dumb plan Pelosi!
Posted by: 3dc   2008-08-05 19:41  

#5  Poeple need to get this straight: a vote for a Dem in congress, no matter what his policy is, is still essentially a vote for Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and their obstructianist policies.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-08-05 17:06  

#4  Say one thing. Vote another.
Posted by: ed   2008-08-05 15:56  

#3  The way to get the voters out to the polling booths is to make them mad. The Donks were able to do that on the last go around by pushing the corruption issue [though few voters really understood that the Donks position was for MORE corrruption, not less]. This time around its up to the Trunks to push the 'price at the pump' issue that the vast majority of Americans have faced. Make them mad is the plan, just make sure you aim well.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-08-05 13:53  

#2  Dems did the same thing in 2004 with judges. They were willing to lose a seat or two on the judge issue. They figured it was worth the policy win. Came back to bite them though. Maybe history will repeat this year.
Posted by: Iblis   2008-08-05 12:10  

#1  ...and Pelosi always intended to take heat on gas prices while tacitly encouraging more vulnerable Democrats to publicly disagree with her and show their independence.

A two party system is only one party away from a dictatorship.

George Washington was absolutely correct, political parties are evil. Our "representatives" don't represent us, they do what they are told by the party or risk censure. Political posturing like this is just ridiculous and should have a hue and cry raised in the MSM, but they don't care since it's their beloved Dems doing the dance of deception.
Posted by: DLR   2008-08-05 12:05  

00:00