You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Airlines to cut 60m seats for Christmas - They' re in a death spiral
2008-08-07
Airlines are set to make the reduction, the equivalent of one in every 14 seats, in response to high oil prices and the global credit crisis, according to the Official Airline Guide (OAG). Reduced availability is almost certain to force up ticket prices. Higher tickets = fewer passengers = higher tickets = fewer passengers, etc etc

In all there will be 59.7m fewer tickets available compared to October-December last year. Routes will be scrapped at 275 airports around the world and 3,500 fewer planes will be needed, according to the OAG.

While Europe will suffer the loss of 5.5m seats, America will be worst hit, with a reduction of about 20m.

Some of Britain's biggest airlines, including British Airways, Ryanaid and Easyjet, have already confirmed that they are making major cuts to their capacity, while experts have predicted that further reductions are sure to follow in 2009 as the industry, which has expanded rapidly in recent years, adjusts to the current economic downturn.

British Airways has already dropped six of its short-haul routes to European destinations from Gatwick, while Ryanair has also axed several routes from Stansted.

Willie Walsh, the chief executive of British Airways, last week said that the airline industry was facing its "worst ever" business environment. a Spokesman for British Airways said: "Our capacity has been reduced 3.1 per cent versus last year. I think that Willie Walsh has been quite upfront about that. He has said it is inevitable that fares will rise."

Steve Casley, the chief executive of the OAG, said: "The data speaks for itself. It took a good three years for the industry to recover from the downturn in 2001 when it had a five per cent drop in capacity and a sevenper cent drop in flights.

"From our statistics, it looks quite possible that we may be facing a far more severe global downturn than we have experienced before.

"The industry's resilience will be pushed to its limits in the coming months."
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#6  Flying today is just a miserable experience from the minute you get up to go to the airport to the minute you get to your actual destination. Rude, surly, uncaring staff, minimum-wage fascists.

That's exactly what I keep telling my husband!
Posted by: Victory Osteen   2008-08-07 19:41  

#5  Seats may be harder to get and more expensive BUT, their on-time rate will be much better as they will not be stressing airport capacity quite so badly. And the aircrew shortage won't be quite so bad either.

No matter how the airlines whine, an airport can only handle so many aircraft as there is a minimum separation requirement between aircraft due to turbulence created by the aircraft. The bigger the aircraft the greater the spacing required. That's why airlines don't like (read hates) General Aviation as the smaller aircraft uses some of the capacity that the airline wants for it's own use.
Posted by: tipover   2008-08-07 19:17  

#4  Something DEFINITELY has to change in this situation. Flying today is just a miserable experience from the minute you get up to go to the airport to the minute you get to your actual destination. Rude, surly, uncaring staff, minimum-wage fascists at the TSA, jam-packed planes, chairs that don't provide as much room as a coffin would, bad or no food, late flights, missed connections...flying just sucks.

Both the workers and the people they "serve" hate the process with a passion. Many people with any choice would, have, and will continue to go a long way out of their way to avoid being exposed to it. It is a rare case where a successful business model involves a clientele that truly hates doing business with a service provider, and that is the situation the airlines are now in. It will get worse before it gets better.



Posted by: Hupiling the Galactic Hero1106   2008-08-07 18:50  

#3  Trains are the most energy efficient transportation. Now if only we had a choice other than the morons at Amtrak.
Posted by: 3dc   2008-08-07 18:40  

#2  Any predictions as to whether the 3500 fewer planes will be older gas guzzlers, or new orders being cancelled?
with neg cash flow, i expect more cnx's than old airframe retirements.

there have been no press releases (AFAIK) from BCAC about cancellations (or deferrals) as yet.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-08-07 17:37  

#1  Make the seats more comfortable and the flight attendants pretty and friendly again or get rid of them altogether in favor of videos.

Personally I think someone should come up with a ferry-style zeppelin. Drive your car onto it and enjoy the ride. It'll be longer but more comfortable and more scenic than a plane and when you arrive at your destination your car will be there as well. Yeah there will be difficult security issues but it would be a very cool way to see the Grand Canyon and the Southern Deserts.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-08-07 17:26  

00:00