You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
How to Stop Putin
2008-08-14
By Charles Krauthammer

The Russia-Georgia cease-fire brokered by France's president is less than meets the eye. Its terms keep moving as the Russian army keeps moving. Russia has since occupied Gori (appropriately, Stalin's birthplace), effectively cutting Georgia in two. The road to the capital, Tbilisi, is open, but apparently Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has temporarily chosen to seek his objectives through military pressure and Western acquiescence rather than by naked occupation.

His objectives are clear. They go beyond detaching South Ossetia and Abkhazia from Georgia and absorbing them into Russia. They go beyond destroying the Georgian army, leaving the country at Russia's mercy.

The real objective is the Finlandization of Georgia through the removal of President Mikheil Saakashvili and his replacement by a Russian puppet.

Which explains Putin stopping the Russian army (for now) short of Tbilisi. What everyone overlooks in the cease-fire terms is that all future steps -- troop withdrawals, territorial arrangements, peacekeeping forces -- will have to be negotiated between Russia and Georgia. But Russia says it will not talk to Saakashvili. Thus regime change becomes the first requirement for any movement on any front. This will be Putin's refrain in the coming days. He is counting on Europe to pressure Saakashvili to resign and/or flee to "give peace a chance."

The Finlandization of Georgia would give Russia control of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, which is the only significant westbound route for Caspian Sea oil and gas that does not go through Russia. Pipelines are the economic lifelines of such former Soviet republics as Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan that live off energy exports. Moscow would become master of the Caspian basin.

Subduing Georgia has an additional effect. It warns Russia's former Baltic and East European satellites what happens if you get too close to the West. It is the first step to reestablishing Russian hegemony in the region.

What is to be done? Let's be real. There's nothing to be done militarily. What we can do is alter Putin's cost-benefit calculations.

We are not without resources. There are a range of measures to be deployed if Russia does not live up to its cease-fire commitments:

1. Suspend the NATO-Russia Council established in 2002 to help bring Russia closer to the West. Make clear that dissolution will follow suspension. The council gives Russia a seat at the NATO table. Message: Invading neighboring democracies forfeits the seat.

2. Bar Russian entry to the World Trade Organization.

3. Dissolve the G-8. Putin's dictatorship long made Russia's presence in this group of industrial democracies a farce, but no one wanted to upset the bear by expelling it. No need to. The seven democracies simply withdraw. (And if Italy's Silvio Berlusconi, who has been sympathetic to Putin's Georgia adventure, wants to stay, he can have an annual G-2 dinner with Putin.) Then immediately announce the reconstitution of the original G-7.

4. Announce a U.S.-European boycott of the 2014 Winter Olympics at Sochi. To do otherwise would be obscene. Sochi is 15 miles from Abkhazia, the other Georgian province just invaded by Russia. The Games will become a riveting contest between the Russian, Belarusan and Jamaican bobsled teams.

All of these steps (except dissolution of the G-8, which should be irreversible) would be subject to reconsideration depending upon Russian action -- most importantly and minimally, its withdrawal of troops from Georgia proper to South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

The most crucial and unconditional measure, however, is this: Reaffirm support for the Saakashvili government and declare that its removal by the Russians would lead to recognition of a government-in-exile. This would instantly be understood as providing us the legal basis for supplying and supporting a Georgian resistance to any Russian-installed regime.

President Bush could cash in on his close personal relationship with Putin by sending him a copy of the highly entertaining (and highly fictionalized) film "Charlie Wilson's War" to remind Vlad of our capacity to make Russia bleed. Putin would need no reminders of the Georgians' capacity and long history of doing likewise to invaders.

Bush needs to make up for his mini-Katrina moment when he lingered in Beijing yukking it up with our beach volleyball team while Putin flew to North Ossetia to direct the invasion of a neighboring country. Bush is dispatching Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to France and Georgia. Not a moment too soon. Her task must be to present these sanctions, get European agreement on as many as possible and begin imposing them, calibrated to Russian behavior. And most important of all, to prevent any Euro-wobbliness on the survival of Georgia's democratically elected government.

We have cards. We should play them. Much is at stake.
Posted by:john frum

#7  I think you may be right, the russian psyche seems to similar to the oriental mindset. Saving face is very important to the russians for what I'm sure are cultural reasons. Embarrassing them that way would be a powerful weapon to use against them.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-08-14 17:08  

#6  Numbers 2 and 3 are already happening.

I would suggest rather than boycotting the Sochi olympics, announce that under the circumstances we are concerned about the safety of civilian athletes in a neighborhood populated by the likes of Ossetian and Abkhazian irregulars. Mention the experience of the Israeli competitors in Munich, when the German rescue attempt was as dangerous to the remaining athletes as was the original PLO attack... and the Russian response to the terror attack on the theater in Moscow. Thoughtful analysis of the lack of Russian experience in successful counterinsurgency efforts would be apposite as well.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-08-14 12:49  

#5  Charles Krauthammer. Soo gonna be ignored by Putin, because isolation increases his power, not decreases it.

The russians are directly challenging the US. Will the US help its allies or not? They know we don't want WW III. We need to bet they don't want it either.

We should declare a no-fly zone for beligerants over georgia and use Iraqi bases to enforce it. That puts their military in a precarious position, plus we can provide non-humanitarian aid to Georgia.

If Putin objects, we run it through the UN. Since the UN doesn't have planes, it will be or planes doing what we want.
Posted by: flash91   2008-08-14 12:17  

#4  Jeeze, not another Jimmy Carteresque Olympic boycott. Is Krauthammer expecting Obama to win?
Posted by: ed   2008-08-14 11:45  

#3  I like these steps. Add to this a suspension of all export credits and the like, suspension of 'most favored nation' status in trade, and a shunning of all Russian diplomatic initiatives at the U.N.


And then make clear that we can cause trouble in other ways. F'r instance, we might have to agree with China that Siberia is under-populated and under-utilized.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-08-14 11:24  

#2  Maybe they could find away to addict his elastic girlfriend to meth. She could probably kill him in about two weeks...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-08-14 10:52  

#1  Those would be good first round steps, the EUnicks are little more than a trade cartel these days, and if it had the potential to cost them 1 euro in the coming years I think you could count on them going limp on us. To do without plentiful russian energy for a year would be unimaginable to them, not for the likes of swarthy brown eyed people in a far off place like Georgia. No, I think whatever is done will be done by us, unilaterally, so to speak. I wouldn't even look for the French to get involved any more than they have.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-08-14 10:38  

00:00