| Submit your comments on this article |
| Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
| US in talks with Turkey for Straits passage of its naval vessels |
| 2008-08-20 |
| Lawmaker and analyst blasts Turkey for 'not allowing a Georgia mission of U.S. hospital ships,' whose passage into Black Sea would violate the straits convention. If Russia gains control of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, it will be a blow on world energy markets, McCain warns The Pentagon has confirmed that U.S. officials are in communication with their Turkish counterparts in order to arrange the passage of humanitarian aid to war-torn Georgia. The U.S. naval vessels carrying the shipment would pass through the Turkish Straits to the Black Sea."The State Department is looking at other options (in addition to air transport) for sustaining the humanitarian relief operations and is looking at some naval vessels," Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said Monday. "The State Department is working at the necessary agreements to achieve some passage in the straits of Turkey and things like that," he said."Surface vessels give us the capability to provide larger amounts of relief supplies and they also give you the platform to operate off aerial assets, vertical lifts, those types of things," Whitman explained, according to an Agence France-Presse report. He did not specify the type of naval vessels that the United States wants to send to Georgia. One Turkish diplomatic source said that he did not expect the United States to insist on the USNS Mercy's passage through the Turkish Straits. However, disregarding the Montreux Convention's clear provisions, one leading U.S. lawmaker strongly criticized Turkey for failing to allow the hospital ship's Black Sea passage."As hundreds of Georgian civilians cry out for international assistance, Turkey is dragging its feet on approving the transit of U.S. hospital ships through the Turkish Straits," said congressman Mark Kirk, a Republican from Illinois and a member of the House Appropriations Committee's Foreign Operations Subcommittee and a Navy reserve officer."Blocking humanitarian and medical supplies from reaching the people of Georgia is unacceptable. We should expect more from a NATO ally like Turkey," he said in a written statement. Kirk said he had sent a letter to other members of the U.S. House of Representatives urging them to call Turkey's Ambassador to Washington U.S., Nabi Sensoy, demanding the Ankara government's approval for the humanitarian mission. Turkey claims it has so far accepted all requests for air transport of humanitarian assistance to Georgia. It says requests for naval transport of such materials will be evaluated under the Montreux Convention's provisions. Ariel Cohen, a Russian expert at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank" in the United States, also criticized Turkey for the hospital ships, expressing the view that "Turkey is our NATO ally and, as a friend of Georgia, in my view, should have been more supportive of their Georgian neighbors and of their American allies" He continued, "And this brings back the bad taste of Turkey, for example, barring American troops from going into Iraq through Turkish ports and Turkish territory in 2003 - a step that vastly damaged the Turkish- American relations. I'd hoped we were putting that behind us." In retaliation to a Georgian attack Aug. 7 on separatists inside the autonomous republic of South Ossetia, thousands of Russian troops poured into the area; eventually invading South Ossetia, Abkhazia, another autonomous republic in Georgia, and parts of Georgia proper. A fragile ceasefire has so far not prompted the Russians to leave the Georgian territory.In a related development Monday, Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, warned that a Russian move to destroy or gain control of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline passing through Georgia, would further increase Russia's influence on energy matters and be a blow on world energy markets." Russia also holds vast energy wealth. And this heavy influence in the oil and gas market has become a political weapon that Russia is clearly prepared to use," McCain said in Orlando, Florida. "Georgia stands at a strategic crossroads in the Caucasus. The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, which brings oil from the Caspian to points west, traverses Georgia. And if that pipeline were to be destroyed or controlled by Russia, global energy supplies would be even more vulnerable to Russian influence, with serious consequences on the world energy market." |
| Posted by:mrp |
| #9 Black sea states have superior rights under Montreux. As the link makes clear, its not a very good treaty, signed under very different conditions from today. One way around it, in extremis, would be to reflag a vessel to Ukraine, I suppose, or to Romania (to keep it within NATO) |
| Posted by: liberalhawk 2008-08-20 22:23 |
| #8 The Turks want a reward for the privilege of letting Uncle Sam protect them from the Russians during the Cold War. It's the kind of thing I've come to expect from them. |
| Posted by: Zhang Fei 2008-08-20 15:26 |
| #7 I recall Mr. Wife telling of sitting at a cafe in Istanbul watching the Russian subs go by. He's about as non-military as it is possible to be. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2008-08-20 15:06 |
| #6 I think A SSN 'shadowing' a surface craft could make it through; especially if that surface craft had noisy screws. Night time, submerged just enough to cover the sail and minimum turns, highly possible. |
| Posted by: USN, Ret. 2008-08-20 14:29 |
| #5 You bet they'd know. I'm not mil/ex-mil, but the Bosporus is narrow, shallow, and heavily trafficked. The Bosporus is only about 50 meters deep and is 0.7 to 3.7 km wide (Wiki). The Turks have strict rules for transit not just for naval ships but also for all merchant ships, just to keep collisions from happening. I'm comfortably certain that the Turks have the Bosporus, Dardenelles and the Sea of Marmara completely wired. |
| Posted by: Steve White 2008-08-20 12:12 |
| #4 To ex Navy Rantburgers: If we sent an SSN through the straits, would Turkey even know? Al |
| Posted by: Frozena Al 2008-08-20 11:45 |
| #3 Ah, our dear friends the Turks. What exactly are they bargaining for now? |
| Posted by: SteveS 2008-08-20 11:25 |
| #2 The Montreux Convention explictly bans aircrat carriers from transiting the Straits. The Soviets, in Soviet-style, simply designated their aircraft carriers as aviation-capable cruisers. The linked article also mentions some of the other limitations on naval transit imposed by the convention. |
| Posted by: mrp 2008-08-20 10:42 |
| #1 Time to send an entire carrier group into the black sea and do some real "peacekeeping". The kind of peacekeeping you do with a peacemaker. |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2008-08-20 10:31 |