| Submit your comments on this article |
| Afghanistan |
| U.S. losing edge in Afghanistan, experts fear |
| 2008-08-25 |
| KABUL, Afghanistan - Taliban insurgents once derided as a ragtag rabble unable to match U.S. troops have transformed into a fighting force - one advanced enough to mount major conventional attacks and claim American lives at a record pace. The U.S. military suffered its 101st death of the year in Afghanistan last week when Sgt. 1st Class David J. Todd Jr., a 36-year-old from Marrero, La., died of gunfire wounds while helping train Afghan police in the northwest. The total number of U.S. dead last year, 111, was a record itself and is likely to be surpassed. Top U.S. generals, European presidents and analysts say the blame lies to the east, in militant sanctuaries in neighboring Pakistan. As long as those areas remain havens where fighters arm, train, recruit and plot increasingly sophisticated ambushes, the Afghan war will continue to sour. "The U.S. is now losing the war against the Taliban," Anthony Cordesman of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, wrote in a report Thursday. A resurgent al-Qaida, which was harbored by the Taliban in the years before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, could soon follow, Cordesman warned. Cordesman called for the U.S. to treat Pakistani territory as a combat zone if Pakistan does not act. "Pakistan may officially be an ally, but much of its conduct has effectively made it a major threat to U.S. strategic interests." An influx of Chechen, Turkish, Uzbek and Arab fighters have helped increase the Taliban's military precision, including an ambush by 100 fighters last week that killed 10 French soldiers, and a rush on a U.S. outpost last month by 200 militants that killed nine Americans. Multidirectional attacks, flawlessly executed ambushes and increasingly powerful roadside and suicide bombs mean the U.S. and 40-nation NATO-led force will in all likelihood suffer its deadliest year in Afghanistan since the 2001 invasion, experts say. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, on a visit to Kabul last week, said he knows that something must "be raised with Pakistan's government, and I will continue to do so." French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who rushed to Afghanistan after the French attack, warned Thursday that "terrorism is winning." "Military sanctuaries are expanding in the (Pakistani) tribal areas," Gen. David McKiernan, the American four-star general in charge of the 50,000-strong NATO-led force here, said last week. McKiernan has called for an additional three brigades of U.S. forces, roughly 10,000 troops, to bolster the 33,000-strong U.S. force here. Complicating relations between the Afghan government and the U.S., a joint Afghan-U.S. military operation in Herat province last week killed about 90 civilians, President Hamid Karzai's office says. The U.S. said it was investigating. About 188 international soldiers have died in Afghanistan this year, including the 101 Americans, according to an Associated Press count. This year's toll is easily on track to surpass the record 222 international troop deaths in 2007. U.S. critics of the Afghan government are becoming more vocal. Rep. Jim Marshall, a Georgia Democrat who is a member of the House Armed Services Committee, said last week that Karzai's government "is not nearly where it should be." "I'm not willing to have a long-term U.S. commitment, a substantial U.S. commitment to Afghanistan, without seeing substantial reform and improvement in the government," Marshall said on a visit to Kabul. Karzai's influence barely extends outside the capital. The Interior Ministry is seen as uniformly corrupt, and opium-poppy cultivation has soared in recent years. "There is a sense of real frustration with the government of President Karzai," McKiernan said. "People were expecting gains over time, but they aren't feeling much." Karzai admitted in an interview last week that Afghanistan still lacks a properly functioning government and that corruption is rampant. He said he will run for a second term next year in hopes of addressing those problems. The president also blamed the rise in Afghan violence directly on Afghanistan's and NATO's neglect of the sanctuaries, training grounds and financial center of the Taliban - a clear reference to Pakistan. The U.S. is believed to have launched several missile strikes into Pakistan's tribal areas this year in an attempt to take out militant leaders. Missiles destroyed a suspected hideout in South Waziristan, near the Afghan border, on Wednesday, killing at least five people. Seth Jones, a RAND Corp. analyst who has studied Afghanistan for years, said Taliban militants have simply become better at war after seven years of practice against U.S. and NATO forces. Fighters, particularly militant commanders, are also using their sanctuary in Pakistan to devastating effect, he said. "I think there's got to be a strike on the leadership structure, including Mullah Omar, Siraj Haqqani and (Gulbuddin) Hekmatyar," who live in Pakistan, Jones said. "As the insurgency has become more sophisticated, many of the senior leaders continue to exist, and they are one of the reasons the insurgency is getting better." Marshall, the Democratic congressman, said Pakistan itself is feeling threatened by the increase in militancy on its soil and wants to see insurgent leaders taken out. "You've seen the progression here," Marshall said. "Initially, we wouldn't even fire back across the (Pakistan) border. We changed that. We're firing back. We're pursuing and now acting on intelligence. We are prepared to use discreet weaponry to take out high-value targets (in Pakistan)." "They want the minimal American presence to help them do that," he said. |
| Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC |
| #15 PRAVDA > RUSSIA MAY STRIKE AT USA "BELOW THE BELT". Various indirect or subtle anti-US/NATO-EU actions, espec vv UNSC. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2008-08-25 22:32 |
| #14 See also CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > US SEES 101st COMBAT DEATH IN AFGHANISTAN AS TALIBAN TURNS INTO A LETHAL, SOPHISTICATED FIGHTING FORCE. Also TOPIX > STUDY: US, ALLIES MUST TREAT MILITANT SANCTUARIES IN PAKISTAN AS EXTENSIONS OF AFGHAN CONFLICT; + IRAN'S INFLUENCE GROWS BEYOND THE PERSIAN GULF IN ASIA + IRAN: FUTURE NEW SUPERPOWER IN ASIA? Why RUSSIA = "KEEPING YOUR FRIENDS CLOSE AND [future]ENEMIES CLOSER", in GEORGIA. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2008-08-25 22:28 |
| #13 Bull shit!!! McCain takes a cut of the drug money TRUTHERS HURT!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Posted by: Albert Grotle3730 2008-08-25 17:09 |
| #12 Karzai may be scared. With the world's heroin supply at stake, there are some powerful profiteers with an interest in poppy fields, besides the Taliban. Notice NATO hasn't been very aggressive, either. |
| Posted by: Danielle 2008-08-25 13:32 |
| #11 Karzai is either weak or a player in the opium trade. The poppy fields need to be burned. They are the financial life blood of the taliban. Until this happens, everything we do is window dressing. Notice that Karzai never calls for the elimination of opium poppy in his country. He is a dick. |
| Posted by: remoteman 2008-08-25 12:58 |
| #10 Scroll up to the next post titled "Pakistan bans Taliban after suicide bombings". One of the parts in dealing with Apache was to put sufficient constant pressure on them that they turned upon Mexican communities to raid, loot, and pillage. While the Apache were conducting their sport on the Gringo side of the border the authorities in Mexico City didn't give a damn about diplomatic protests or demands to do something. When the stuff came home, things started to finally change. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2008-08-25 12:16 |
| #9 Not un-named - they cite Cordesman, who's a bona fide pencil-pusher. I suspect that Michael Yon would agree with most of the analysis laid out here - he called Afghanistan a spec ops hunting preserve, and he didn't mean it as a compliment. I get the impression that Karzai is trying to play Prince Sihanouk these days - he's starting to act as if he's got an interest in triangulation. |
| Posted by: Mitch H. 2008-08-25 10:54 |
| #8 Expert - n. - The first guy in the reporters Rolodex. |
| Posted by: Grenter, Protector of the Geats 2008-08-25 10:47 |
| #7 They are only experts in their own minds and the minds of the MSM. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2008-08-25 10:25 |
| #6 How many decades did we spend on the Mexican border dealing with the Apache? Experts my eye. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2008-08-25 09:20 |
| #5 Yeah, I'm sure W is just sitting there at his desk, twiddling his thumbs, and watching the world go by. /sarc |
| Posted by: gorb 2008-08-25 08:57 |
| #4 Yes, but are they "baffled"? |
| Posted by: tu3031 2008-08-25 08:40 |
| #3 Experts. Un-named experts. What would we do without them. |
| Posted by: Whiskey Mike 2008-08-25 08:28 |
| #2 Why are these foreign terrorists flocking into Afghanistan? 'Cause they got whipped at home. Up to now, the Taliban has been more of a nuisance to any trained and equipped force. With these reinforcements, they will need to be taken a bit more seriously. But just keep in mind that while the new fighters are tougher, they are mostly losers back home. |
| Posted by: Richard of Oregon 2008-08-25 07:17 |
| #1 U.S. losing edge in Afghanistan, experts fear Bull Shit, I trust Our Air Force, Air Calv, Marines, Army, Navy, Coasties more than any other Armed Force in the entire World! |
| Posted by: Red Dawg 2008-08-25 04:50 |