| Submit your comments on this article |
| India-Pakistan |
| Rice urges Congress to OK India nuke deal, pauses on Russia |
| 2008-09-06 |
| Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pressed Congress to approve a nuclear deal with India after the agreement was endorsed Saturday by nations that supply nuclear material and technology. "I certainly hope we can get it through," the top U.S. diplomat told reporters as she traveled from Tunisia to Algeria during a trip to North Africa. "It'd be a huge step for the U.S.-India relationship." Rice said she would speak in coming days with the leaders of the appropriate congressional committees to see if the deal can be approved by Congress before it breaks for the rest of the year to campaign for November elections. "We understand that time is very short," she said. Supporters of the civilian nuclear deal say atomic cooperation with India would provide crucial energy to a democratic, economically vibrant country. Critics say it would ruin global efforts to stop the spread of atomic weapons and boost India's nuclear arsenal Also on Saturday, Rice said now is not the right time for the U.S. to move forward on a once-celebrated deal for civilian nuclear cooperation with Russia. Her comment increased speculation that President Bush is planning to punish Moscow for invading Georgia, a former Soviet republic, by canceling the agreement. Such a move is being planned, according to senior Bush administration officials, but is not yet final. "The time isn't right for the Russia agreement," Rice told reporters while flying from Tunisia to Algeria during a visit to North Africa. "We'll be making an announcement about that later." U.S.-Russian relations have cooled considerably since last month's military standoff between Russia and Georgia. On Saturday, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said the war has shown the world that "Russia is a nation to be reckoned with." Traveling in Italy, Vice President Dick Cheney pushed back against Moscow, saying: "Russia's actions are an affront to civilized standards and are completely unacceptable." The nuclear deal was signed in May by U.S. and Russian officials and is now before Congress. It would give the U.S. access to modern Russian nuclear technology and clear the way for Russia to establish itself as a lucrative center for the import and storage of spent nuclear fuel from American-supplied reactors around the world. Such a deal was seen as crucial to boosting relations with Russia, and to fulfilling Bush's vision of increasing civilian nuclear energy use worldwide as a way to combat rising energy demands and climate change. Withdrawing the agreement from Capitol Hill would have little effect. The deal probably would not have been approved before Bush's term ends in January. But pulling it would send a message to Russia that its actions in Georgia are not acceptable and will not go unanswered. The Nuclear Suppliers Group, which governs the legal world trade in nuclear components and know-how, approved the U.S.-India deal after contentious talks and concessions to countries that feared the pact could set a dangerous precedent. Some opposing countries, including Austria, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway and Switzerland, had expressed fears that a reversal of more than three decades of U.S. policy toward India could set a dangerous precedent in the struggle to discourage other nations from pursuing weapons of mass destruction. Rep Edward J. Markey, a senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and co-chairman of the House Bipartisan Task Force on Nonproliferation, said the Bush administration managed to "strong-arm" the Nuclear Suppliers Group into skirting normal rules governing international nuclear trade. Markey, D-Mass., said there needs to be clear consequences if India breaks its commitments or resumes nuclear testing. "This agreement effectively blows a hole in the global nonproliferation regime, setting a dangerous precedent. What kind of lesson does it send to countries like Pakistan, Iran and North Korea, when we skirt the rules for our friends, but insist on strict compliance for them?" Markey asked. "The nuclear supplier nations cannot preach nuclear temperance from a barstool, and the India nuclear deal is going to undermine the credibility of international efforts to prevent the further spread of the bomb." The agreement would reverse three decades of U.S. policy by shipping atomic fuel to India in return for international inspections of India's civilian reactors. "It's no secret that India has been outside the nonproliferation regime for the entire history of its program," Rice said. Rice said she had made "a lot of calls" to foreign officials to help win approval. She spoke with China's foreign minister on Saturday, which a senior State Department official said was important in reaching the compromise. "It's been a good week for those negotiations, but we'll just have to see whether it's still possible in Congress," Rice said. This past week, a leading Democratic lawmaker made public an administration document that says the U.S. had the right to immediately stop nuclear trade with India if India conducted an atomic test. The U.S. position appeared at odds with Indian officials' insistence that the accord would not ban Indian nuclear tests. |
| Posted by:john frum |