You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Marine praised by Bush won't get Medal of Honor
2008-09-18
A Marine sergeant singled out by President Bush for throwing his body on a grenade to save his comrades in Iraq will receive the prestigious Navy Cross rather than the nation's highest military award, military officials said.

The family of Sgt. Rafael Peralta, who was posthumously nominated for the nation's highest military honor, told the North County Times of Escondido, Calif., they were disappointed he was not receiving the Medal of Honor. "I don't understand why if the president has been talking about him," his mother, Rosa Peralta, told the newspaper, which was the first to report the bestowing of the Navy Cross.

Rosa Peralta said she was informed during a meeting with Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Richard Natonski that a committee could not agree on awarding the Medal of Honor to her son, who Marine Corps officials say was first wounded by friendly fire. She said the general mentioned the friendly fire aspect as part of her son's death during the discussion.

Marine Corps spokesman Mike Alvarez confirmed the meeting, saying only that it was a personal briefing between Natonski and Rosa Peralta to inform her that the secretary of the Navy would award the Navy Cross posthumously for extraordinary heroism. The Navy Cross is the second highest honor for combat heroism a Marine can receive.

The secretary of the Navy's public affairs office in Washington, D.C., did not immediately return an after-hours telephone call Wednesday seeking comment.

Headquarters Marine Corps spokesman Maj. David Nevers told The Associated Press that the Navy Cross for Peralta "is not bestowed lightly." Nevers said only 23 sailors and Marines out of the thousands who have served in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan have received the Navy Cross. "The awarding of a medals of valor is a methodical process and carefully conducted to ensure the sacrifice and service of our Marines and sailors is appropriately honored," he said.

Peralta was shot several times in the face and body during a house-to-house search in Fallujah on Nov. 15, 2004, during some of the fiercest fighting of the war. According to a report by a Marine combat photographer who witnessed the act, Peralta lay wounded on the floor of a house and grabbed a grenade that had been lobbed by an insurgent. He absorbed the blast with his body, dying instantly.

In 2005, Natonski, then-commanding general of the 1st Marine Division, ordered an investigation to determine the source of a bullet fragment recovered from Peralta's body. "Following multiple and exhaustive reviews, the evidence supports the finding that Peralta was likely hit by 'friendly fire,'" the Marine Corps said Wednesday in a press release. "This finding had no bearing on the decision to award the Navy Cross medal."

Bush cited Peralta's heroism in a Memorial Day speech in 2005, saying the Marine "understood that America faces dangerous enemies, and he knew the sacrifices required to defeat them."

Peralta, who was assigned to Hawaii's 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, moved to San Diego from Tijuana as a teenager. He was 25.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#5  Just saw this article (posted @ 7:41 Seattle time): his Mother is going to Congress to try to get the MoH.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/379738_hero19.html
Posted by: USN,Ret.   2008-09-18 22:58  

#4  It removes nothing from the Love this man had for his friends. It is impossible to do the two second thing from a turret all geared up. I stood there before. You assume the windows in the cab are open? It is not a pick and flick. It is a warn and dive or a go down on it decision.

In circumspect, Those who get that medal usually have a tinge more done.
Posted by: newc   2008-09-18 19:01  

#3  USN: it is a combination of probabilities and physics.

Grenades that land on the ground (disregarding airburst and burst as soon as they hit), have a probable time window for detonation of between one and three seconds.

Unless you are already prone and immediately roll on the grenade, it will take you at least a second to a second and a half to get down on top of it. However a stoop-grab-grounder toss can be done in less than a second. Advantage goes to tossing.

You can test this one yourself.

In the open, when a grenade on the ground explodes, the vast majority of the blast and frag go in an upward 90 degree cone. If you can get out of that cone, both blast and frag injuries are significantly lower.

Even a one-step-away-and down effort will give perhaps a ruptured ear drum and lesser frag injuries. Distances more than that are inverse square in severity, except for the "lucky frag" injuries in the maximum hazard area.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-09-18 17:18  

#2  Disagree; but if the MoH disqualifier was the 'friendly fire' fragment, then i think somebody should rethink this; he could have 'retreated' to have his first wounds looked at, and who knows how many the full force of the grenade would have affected.
GWB, override this decision. Please.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-09-18 14:21  

#1  I am actually glad of this. While he deserves credit for his act of self sacrifice, there is realistically almost no reason to ever throw yourself on a hand grenade, and grenade instructors have long fought against Hollywood depictions of jumping on hand grenades.

Under most circumstances, it is just an act of suicide based on ignorance of how grenades function and explode.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-09-18 09:25  

00:00