You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
2008-10-22
In this live-and-let-live town, where medical marijuana clubs do business next to grocery stores and an annual fair celebrates sadomasochism, prostitutes could soon walk the streets without fear of arrest.
Hookerage has, of course, always been against the law in San Francisco. There has never been a time where women were exploited in large numbers, hawking their personal wares from the streets or spending a miserable existence taking on all comers in cribs on the Barbary Coast. Such things would never happen in the City by the Bay.
San Francisco would become the first major U.S. city to decriminalize prostitution if voters next month approve Proposition K--a measure that forbids local authorities from investigating, arresting or prosecuting anyone for selling sex.
Are you sure it's not Proposition K-Y? And I don't think I'd use "proposition" in the wording.
They had the separate K-Y version for homosexuals, but that was deemed discriminatory.
The ballot question technically would not legalize prostitution since state law still prohibits it, but the measure would eliminate the power of local law enforcement officials to go after prostitutes.
In the very near future it seems San Francisco will be it's own little State where only San Francisco laws apply.
Proponents say the measure will free up $11 million the police spend each year arresting prostitutes and allow them to form collectives.
Ahhh, "collectives". Is that another word for Unions?
Not quite...
The foundation upon which the Barbary Coast reared its fantastic structure of crime and debauchery was a system of commercialized prostitution that occupied a semi-lawful status in San Francisco for more than sixty years. Throughout that period the harlot was the divekeeper's greatest single asset and his most important attraction; whatever she did worked to his advantage, whether she labored as a streetwalker, as an inmate of the brothels, as a decoy in the deadfalls, or as a waiter girl and performer in the dance-halls, concert saloons, melodeons, and peepshows. Without the drawing power of the professional bawd it is doubtful if the Barbary Coast could have maintained, for more than a few years, a profitable existence as a so-called amusement center. In the final analysis a great majority of the men who visited the quarter did so because of the lewdness and depravity of the women who were to be found there; and when open prostitution was driven out of the shadow of the Golden Gate, the Barbary Coast soon followed it into oblivion.
We're not even going to bring up the Sidney Ducks.
"It will allow workers to organize for our rights and for our safety," said Patricia West, 22, who said she has been selling sex for about a year by placing ads on the Internet. She moved to San Francisco in May from Texas to work on Proposition K-Y.
I'm guessing that wasn't the only reason she moved ...
Even in tolerant San Francisco--where the sadomasochism fair draws thousands of tourists and a pornographic video company is housed in a former armory--the measure faces an uphill battle, with much of the political establishment opposing it.
From the first 49ers to the first hookers was a matter of a day or two. From the first hookers to the first Vigilance Committee was about 18 months. The second was five years later.
Some form of prostitution is already legal in two states. Brothels are allowed in rural counties in Nevada. And Rhode Island permits the sale of sex behind closed doors between consulting adults, but it prohibits street prostitution and brothels. In 2004, almost two-thirds of voters in nearby Berkeley rejected decriminalization. But proponents of Proposition K-Y say their proposal has a better shot in San Francisco, which they believe is more sexually liberal than the city across the bay.
More at the link. There are both pros and cons to legalized prostitution and I don't pretend to judge one way or another. The fact that a municipality that is subject to State laws is considering not obeying or enforcing them is my point here. That goes for any municipality that refuses to obey or enforce State or Federal laws.
Posted by:Deacon Blues

#9  San Francisco = Free Zone for everything.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-10-22 18:08  

#8   Proponents say the measure will free up $11 million the police spend each year arresting prostitutes and allow them to form collectives

What the hell do the police need to form collectives for?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-10-22 16:36  

#7  They don't "weigh" anything excepting drugs in San Francisco.
"weighing" is an alien though concept.. in SanFran.
Posted by: 3dc   2008-10-22 13:06  

#6  They pay the homeless in SF about $400 a month. Perhaps they should do the same for the hookers. Make it a free service of the city.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2008-10-22 10:32  

#5  Deputize the bums.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-10-22 10:17  

#4  Then who would collect the parking fines?
Posted by: ed   2008-10-22 09:51  

#3  They wanna save a lotta money, why don't they just disband the police force? Wouldn't think there's much of a need for one in San Francisco, seeing how they don't consider much to be illegal.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-10-22 09:46  

#2  but the measure would eliminate the power of local law enforcement officials to go after prostitutes.

No, I don't think the DA's and cops will ever stop going after the girls. It's one of the perks of the job isn't it?
Posted by: GORT   2008-10-22 07:41  

#1  They have hookers in San Francisco? Who knew? I would have thought the amateur competition had run them out of business by now.

The whores won't be allowed to wear panties, though: California law requires that public utilities be open for inspection at all times.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2008-10-22 02:03  

00:00