| Submit your comments on this article |
| Sri Lanka |
| Interceptors' missile 'lock on' failure jolts SLAF |
| 2008-11-04 |
| Tuesday's failure to shoot down a single LTTE aircraft despite timely detection by radar has jolted the SLAF into investigating its limitations amidst evidence that the enemy has acquired a capability to neutralise the threat of a heat seeking missile attack. An authoritative source said that Chinese F7s launched from Katunayake air base had failed to zero-in-on the enemy aircraft. "Their (F7s) missile systems failed to 'lock on with the enemy aircraft," the source said. This would necessitate an overall review of the SLAF's strategy, the source said. The military asserted that the LTTE could try to exploit the situation. The initial detection had been made north-east of Mannar at 10.18 p.m. by 2D radar installed by the Government of India at the SLAF base at Vavuniya. Thaladdi had come under attack within minutes after the detection, the source said. Both the Indian radar and a Chinese 3D radar station located in the Western Province had detected the enemy aircraft but interceptors failed to carry out a successful missile strike. 2D radar provides direction and the distance of a target whereas the Chinese radar provides even the altitude of a target. Last September, a heat seeking missile fired by an interceptor brought down one of the two LTTE aircraft returning to their base after attacking Vavuniya air base. Although the LTTE denied the SLAF claim, a senior military official pointed out that the LTTE had deployed only one aircraft to carry out Tuesday's operation. Each previous raid directed at military and economic targets had involved two aircraft, the official said. "May be they are now left with one aircraft," he speculated. But the possibility of their having additional aircraft couldn't be ruled out, he said. The SLAF said that after dropping two bombs on Thaladdi base, the aircraft had veered westwards towards the sea and flew southwards before moving back towards land at a point near estuary of the Kelani River. The SLAF said that the aircraft had taken almost the same route back to its base in the Vanni. Under anti-aircraft fire, the LTTE plane had dropped two bombs over the Kelanitissa power facility. The damage caused to two power stations, combined cycle power plant and diesel powered Fiat GT 7 installed within the Kelanitissa complex would cause a severe deficit in the country's electricity demand. Although Power Minister John Seneviratne and his Deputy Mahindananda Aluthgamage played down the issue, The Island learns that the GT 7 had been severely damaged. After inspecting the damaged facility, Seneviratne said that it would take about six months restore GT 7. Addressing a hurriedly arranged press conference at Kelanitissa, the minister expressed confidence that the CEB would be able to meet any shortfall of supply through other means. Kelanitssa workers told The Island that both stations had been switched off pending investigations. They said that the GT 7 generated 110 mega watts while the combined cycle power plant generated 165 mega watts. Altogether, they generated 275 mega watts out of 530 mega watts produced by Kelanitissa facility. They said the severe damage caused to the combined cycle power plant would deny the country the capacity to generate 55 mega watts almost free of charge. Of this particular plant, 110 mega watts were generated by using naphtha and 55 mega watts produced as a byproduct, they said. "This would be heavy burden on the taxpayer," a senior employee told The Island. The SLAF is responsible for a series of highly successful air strikes against the LTTE since August 2006. The LTTE fighting capability has been greatly reduced to SLAF action directed against a range of targets. |
| Posted by:john frum |
| #6 Ah hell... Okay.... Glug, glug |
| Posted by: .5MT 2008-11-04 16:43 |
| #5 So would a MOAB... eventually. If I'm wrong, we'd just have to keep trying, right? ;-) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2008-11-04 15:57 |
| #4 A P51 would also get the job done well too. |
| Posted by: Abu do you love 2008-11-04 15:07 |
| #3 It's extremely difficult to get a heat-seeking missile to lock onto a small propeller-driven aircraft. There just isn't that much heat generated. That' one of several reasons the US requires combat aircraft to be armed with a cannon. An A-10 would be the most useful aircraft to use against these lightly-armed, relatively slow-moving aircraft. It's got enough speed to catch them, and can slow down enough that it has a lot of time to aim and fire at the craft. |
| Posted by: Old Patriot 2008-11-04 12:21 |
| #2 the Chinese radar provides even the altitude of a target. Sekrets, we have lost dem. |
| Posted by: .5MT 2008-11-04 10:22 |
| #1 How effective are heat seeking missiles against aircraft that are not jets? Lot less heat to lock on to? |
| Posted by: Chuck Simmins 2008-11-04 09:59 |