You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Stevens juror tells judge she left for horse race
2008-11-04
Lying to a judge? That'll go over well ...
WASHINGTON -- Juror No. 4 in Sen. Ted Stevens' federal corruption trial, otherwise known as Marian Hinnant, didn't leave to attend her father's funeral in California, as she told the judge at the time. Instead, Hinnant had a plane ticket to see the Breeders' Cup at Santa Anita Park and didn't want to miss it, she told the judge Monday, in what sounded like completely irrational and perhaps even delusional remarks.

"I just wanted to go to the Breeders' Cup," she told reporters after a hearing the judge held to find out why she had left town and lost contact with him, forcing him to replace her just hours before the jury found Stevens guilty.

Hinnant also told reporters that she would have found the Alaska senator guilty had she remained on the jury. "He was guilty, but these other guys are just as guilty," she said, referring to other members of Congress.

Her lawyer, federal public defender A.J. Kramer, tried to keep her from saying much in court, telling the judge only that "her state of mind was such that she had to go to California." "She apologizes to the court. In fact, her father did not die," Kramer said. "The story about her father was just one that popped into her head."

Hinnant cut in, however, and in a thick Kentucky drawl gave a rambling, incoherent and completely baffling monologue about her former employers in the horse-racing industry in Kentucky. She mentioned drugs, wiretaps and horse racing but made little sense. "I'm not the one who was selling the drugs; I'm not the one who was doing the drugs," she said.
Um, no, course not, sure ...
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan let her go, saying that he was going to "accept Mr. Kramer's representation that you were not able to (deliberate) and for reasons that were serious to you."

He added: "I'm convinced you were not able to deliberate."
That's a true statement ...
Sullivan told her that she didn't have to speak to the news media, but she said she was willing to talk, and she did. Outside the courthouse, about 10 reporters followed her to a nearby subway stop, as did several of Stevens' attorneys. Kramer escorted her to the station and encouraged her not to say much, but Hinnant appeared not to be able to restrain herself.

Hinnant, 52, told reporters that she works at Avis car rental in Union Station in Washington. She worked in horse racing for many years and simply wanted to see the race, since she already had a plane ticket to California.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  A juror who admits preconceived notions of guilt? Is that reason enough for a mistrial?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-11-04 13:08  

#4  One of the many illiterate, ignorant species of total incompetents who will vote for Obama bin Biden in droves today. Public schools and the NEA have delivered to us the most uneducated and dumbest electorate to date.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2008-11-04 12:15  

#3  I wish I could agree, but we're talking Breeders Cup here, so I can kinda see JN #4 probblem, sit all day on a hard chair in Alaska listening to dullards or go to the Breeders Cup?
Posted by: .5MT   2008-11-04 11:31  

#2  But wait! There's more! If they're not a jailed felon, they get to help decide who runs the country, too!
Posted by: gorb   2008-11-04 03:47  

#1  It's a warm and fuzzy feeling I get when I think of people like this deciding my guilt or innocence.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-11-04 00:36  

00:00