You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
States consider billions in cuts as deficits widen
2008-11-07
The Donk dominated California Legislature has always had an interesting spending habit. They are like a person that earns $80,000 a year and gets a one time $20,000 bonus, he immediately goes out and buys a bigger house and a new car. The next year there is no bonus so he's upside down. This time it's worse, he gets a pay cut to $60,000 a year. The Donks will blame the Trunks for cutting their precious handouts.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) - The nation's economic meltdown is taking state budgets down with it - especially in California, where Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Thursday he wants to close a $11.2 billion gap in part by raising sales taxes on everything from cars to Disneyland tickets.

Several other states are confronting billion-dollar deficits. Some, including Massachusetts, North Carolina and Wisconsin, have ordered broad and deep cuts in spending, while others have only begun to consider how to compensate for their revenue wells drying up.

Schwarzenegger wants $4.5 billion in cuts; one of his proposals would force state employees to take a day off each month without pay and give up two holidays. But he says cuts alone aren't enough to deal with a steep drop in revenue, and he proposes $4.7 billion in tax hikes, including a three-year, 1.5-percentage-point increase in the sales tax.

"We have a dramatic situation here and it takes dramatic solutions ... and immediate action," Schwarzenegger said as he called the Legislature back into session to deal with the shortfall. "We must stop the bleeding."

California's bleak new projections come just six weeks after Schwarzenegger signed this year's budget, which made $7.1 billion in cuts to services to help close a $15.2 billion deficit. "I'm not a believer in taxes, I'm not a believer of increasing fees. It's just under these circumstances it's necessary to do," Schwarzenegger said.

California relies heavily on capital gains taxes, which have plunged along with the stock market. Sales taxes also have plummeted as consumers have cut off nonessential spending. And California is among the states hardest hit by falling housing prices.

The state controller issued a statement saying California runs "the very real risk" of a severe cash shortage by the end of the year and may have to resort to borrowing so it can balance its books. Its deficit is now 11 percent of general fund spending and could double by next fiscal year if not addressed immediately, the controller said.

The shortfall in Arizona is even worse, on a percentage basis, than California's. Gov. Janet Napolitano on Thursday said the state's deficit had grown to an estimated $1.2 billion, or 12 percent of general fund spending, forcing lawmakers into a likely special session by the end of the year.

The deficit in Washington state is projected at $3.2 billion, but could grow by the time officials get an update later this month.

Nevada Gov. Jim Gibbons and the Legislature have cut spending by $1.2 billion because of declining tax revenue, but Gibbons warned lawmakers they might have to cut another 14 percent when they go into session in February.

Wisconsin's governor has ordered state agencies to trim 10 percent to cover a $3 billion hole over two years, while North Carolina's governor has ordered several departments to make do with 5 percent less. Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick announced last month that the state would eliminate up to 1,000 jobs and make more than $1 billion in cuts and spending controls to bridge a growing budget gap.

New York Gov. David Paterson last week asked Congress for as much as $8.6 billion from an economic stimulus measure Democrats are considering. He already has called a special session for later this month to tackle a $1.5 billion deficit for the fiscal year that ends in April and warned that New York's deficit could hit $47 billion by 2012.

California's crisis has brought a change in rhetoric from Schwarzenegger. Since taking office in 2003, he has blamed "autopilot spending" by the Legislature whenever California has confronted fiscal woes, but on Thursday he said, "It is now a revenue problem rather than a spending problem."

His proposed sales-tax increase would apply to items as varied as cars and amusement park and sporting game tickets. For the first time, the sales tax also would be applied to services such as vehicle, appliance and furniture repairs, veterinarian services and even greens fees for playing golf. Taxes on alcohol also would increase.

The sales tax plan met immediate opposition from some in the business community. Peter Welch, president of the California New Car Dealers Association, said raising vehicle prices by hundreds of dollars is the last thing his faltering industry needs. "The fact of the matter is we are in an historic car recession (that's) bordering on a depression," he said. "We actually think we need an economic stimulus package to get people to come in and buy cars. This is just the opposite."

Other revenue could come from raising the registration fee for vehicles by $12 and taxing companies that extract oil from California, which Schwarzenegger said would generate $528 million this year.

The governor also wants to accelerate hundreds of millions of dollars in public works spending to spark job creation. At the same, the newly unemployed would struggle more under his plan. He wants to tighten eligibility for unemployment benefits because the state's unemployment insurance fund is on the brink of insolvency.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#15  You guys are wrong. I've lived both types of places, w/income tax and without. With the income tax they can hide the fat/corruption easier. Without it, every one of those little taxing entities has to explain why they need more money and what they intend to use it for.
ANYTIME you can bring government closer to the people and make it more responsive, it gets better. WE, you got it wrong and the people of Mass are damned fools for having not taken the golden opportunity of getting rid of the millstone around their necks. Of course, that's exactly what I would have anticipated they would do, being from Mass...
Posted by: Jolutch Mussolini7800   2008-11-07 18:17  

#14  WE gets it; WA state has something like 800 distinct taxing districts / authorities; each city or county has their own tax rate; our newly reelected donk gov'nor has decreed that WA state will tax internet sales. there are several e-sites that have ceased doing business in the state because they do not have the desire or cash to set up a sales tax table that can capture the correct S.T.
yet any politician that even whispers income tax is dead meat.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-11-07 18:05  

#13  Coloradans just defeated several revenue bills, including one to gut TABOR. This morning's newspaper had an article that the city's Mayor is going to push a sales tax increase in the April city elections. There's plenty of fat to cut, and many other ways to balance the city's budget without a tax increase, but the first instinct of politicians is "raise taxes".
Posted by: Old Patriot   2008-11-07 18:04  

#12  Ah, but the first rule of bureaucracy is that, when facing cuts, cut the meat first and leave the fat.

The logic in this is that the powers that be will defend the meat from cuts, but nobody thinks you should have had fat in the first place.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-11-07 14:56  

#11  Ya gotta be tough to live up here. Either that or you're trapped...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-11-07 14:55  

#10  City of San Diego is pushing 10% cuts on all Departments, even reimburseables
Posted by: Frank G   2008-11-07 14:53  

#9  I live here in Khalifornia. At least everyone will be paying the proposed tax and not just "the rich". But the Gov also needs to continue to push a 10% across the board cut in spending. Sure people are going to scream. They like their free stuff. But guess what, I'll bet that each department finds a way to operate on 10% less. I'll bet they discover efficiencies that were staring them in the face. Government is like a tumor...one of the few ways to stop its growth is to cut off its blood supply.
Posted by: remoteman   2008-11-07 14:51  

#8  Woozie you sank that nail with one stroke of your hammer.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-11-07 14:27  

#7  JM7800,
The only sensible thing the Taxachusetts voters did was to retain an income tax. They are deep in the hole. Someone has to pay. They put in "free" medical care and it's waay in debt already. Have you ever resided in any state with no state income tax ? What you have is 20 or 30 taxing entities instead of one. And they all need increases all the damn time. Of, course they put that shitbag Kerry back in. They certainly are demented in that sense. As for Californios, they're even worse. Fot the past 20 years, they keep passing bond meaures they don't want to pay for. Just proves they can't even operate a calculator. They were fortunate to just have sold about $5 bilion in revenue bonds. But the situation is precarious, because the commies(not Demmos, not lefties...commies) have a deathgrip on the legislature. They insiist on spending 20% more each year than is taken in. When Ahnold mentions cutbacks, everyone starts hollering. His first instinct of 10% across the board cutbacks was correct. Let everyone taste the poison. Otherwise, belly up to the bar and pay the bar bill, chilluns.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter 2700   2008-11-07 11:37  

#6  You've got to be a sick puppy to live in Mass.

Call it the Pimp Syndrome. They've found their pimp(s) they're comfortable with.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-11-07 09:13  

#5  They could have also replaced Kerry with a former US Army officer, Delta Force vet, former agency AND FBI Special Agent who was instrumental in forming the FBI's first HRT element and CT force. He ran his own very successful security business.

New Englanders....they never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. I had an old NCO years ago who had spent a lot of time in Army counterintelligence in the late 50's and 60's at Fort Devons and the East Coast. He always said "if the nation goes communist, it will happen in New England first." I have no sympathy for them whatsoever.
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-11-07 07:53  

#4  The people of Massachusetts had a golden opportunity Tuesday to dump their state income tax. They voted it down. Now I see why they keep sending losers like Frank and Kennedy to DC--they're all masochists who LIKE being hurt.

You've got to be a sick puppy to live in Mass.
Posted by: Jolutch Mussolini7800   2008-11-07 07:41  

#3  Negative feedback. The idea is during good times they put some in the bank for the lean years. But somehow beautiful theories get beaten to a pulp by the ugly reality of politics.
Posted by: ed   2008-11-07 07:25  

#2  Every entity on the planet will cut spending in bad times, except government.

Why doesn't government?
Posted by: badanov   2008-11-07 07:13  

#1  Crash the ship of state for the insurance money.
Posted by: ed   2008-11-07 07:09  

00:00