You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
China: Rich nations should ditch 'unsustainable' lifestyles
2008-11-07
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao and a top UN official urged industrialised nations Friday to alter their lifestyles and not let the global financial crisis hamper climate change efforts.
You first. Let's see your party leaders live like your peasants, as one example ...
Industrialised nations should also help developing countries respond to climate change, Wen said at the opening of a two-day international meeting on global warming in Beijing.
Since we have to be sustainable, we'll have to forego any assistance coming your way.
"The developed countries have a responsibility and an obligation to respond to global climate change by altering their unsustainable way of life," the state news agency Xinhua quoted him as saying. "As the global financial crisis spreads and worsens, and the world economy slows down, the international community must not waver in its determination to tackle climate change."
Again, you first: you stop building coal-fired power plants, for example.
The gathering in Beijing is focused on the development and transfer of technology that can help tackle climate change ahead of next month's talks on creating a new global treaty on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Representatives from 76 nations are attending.

China proposed last week that rich nations devote one percent of their economic output to helping poor countries fight global warming.
How much does China contribute? As if I didn't already know the answer.
Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said Friday a lack of firm funding commitments could derail efforts to cut emissions in developing countries, especially during the financial crisis.
That would seem to be a problem, especially for the UN apparatchiks ...
"The financial crisis is definitely going to affect international climate change policy," he said.

But "the financial crisis offers the world an opportunity to move away from toxic investments and make sustainable investments, for example into low emissions energy infrastructure," he said.

In the landmark Kyoto Protocol, rich nations agreed to targets for cutting greenhouse gases as well as helping to transfer clean technology to developing nations to help them reduce their emissions. But much of the pledged transfers are not happening, said de Boer.

"Industrial countries must meet their technology transfer obligations," he told journalists. "Given their historical responsibility for the problem, it is essential that industrialised countries take the lead in reducing emissions and that they show real leadership (in climate change negotiations)."
We didn't sign, and even the new Senate won't ratify Kyoto, so count us out.
Formal negotiations on a new treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol when it expires in 2012 will begin in Poznan, Poland next month, with the UN hoping that a new agreement will be ready by the end of 2009, de Boer said. "Governments have used 2008 to gather information and clarify their positions on a number of topics. At Poznan governments need to go into full negotiation mode and make concrete results," he said.

China has long resisted calls to join rich nations in setting targets for emissions cuts, saying its relatively low per capita emissions and recent emergence as a major source of greenhouse gases should exempt it from action. Scientists said in September that China had leapfrogged the United States as the world's biggest producer of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the principal gases that cause global warming.
Doesn't matter, the Chinese will still demand a free pass, and the apparatchiks will allow them to have one.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#12  China: Rich nations should ditch 'unsustainable' lifestyles
Phew!!
That lets the US off the hook.
Posted by: tipper   2008-11-07 20:20  

#11  At least under Communism Soviet citizens [Russian/National]were poor but optimistic.

Half of an imaginary loaf is better than no loaf at all.
Posted by: SteveS   2008-11-07 19:21  

#10  IIRC, PRAVDA [paraph]> At least under Communism Soviet citizens [Russian/National]were poor but optimistic.

DARE BECOMES:

MSM-NET > 2009-2016 [beyond?] > At least under OWG-NWO + GLOBAL SOCIALISM, Fascist = Limited Communist-Whom are-Weirdly-and-Mysteriously-But-Only-Coincidentally-PCorrectly/Deniably-NOT-"REAL/FULL COMMUNISTS" American = Amerikan citizens were poor but optimistic???

* WORLD MIL FORUM POSTER(S) [paraph/Chinese = Chinglish Translation] > COLD WAR US LEFTIST POLITICIANS HAVE MADE AMERICA INTO A VEILED/SHADOW SOCIALIST STATE. WORLD JUST NEEDS PRESIDENT OBAMA AND SUCCESSORS TO MAKE IT OFFICIAL. AMERICA IS FINISHED???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-11-07 18:26  

#9  Where will we import "stuff" from? It seems to me the latte-sipping wing of the American people now considers factories dirty, and working in them far beneath them.

What to do?
Posted by: Grenter, Protector of the Geats   2008-11-07 16:38  

#8  ed is right on the mark. Premier Wen Jiabao---we agree with your statement of ditching unsustainable lifestyles. We will start with imported cheap and toxic items from your country. Beware of what you wish for.

I will implement your policy immediately with my family. Thank you for opening my eyes.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2008-11-07 14:39  

#7  Better yet save 2% of US GDP and quit importing from China. That will have multiplier effect on reducing CO2 and make US lifestyles a heck of a lot more sustainable.
Posted by: ed   2008-11-07 13:38  

#6  98 pound trophy wives driving Ford Excursions, thats a problem
Posted by: Angoger Black9540   2008-11-07 13:31  

#5  "The financial crisis is definitely going to affect international climate change policy," he said.

Good. When the planet doesn't melt away or turn into a block of ice, maybe people will finally realize what bullshit this is.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-11-07 12:11  

#4  They should consider the law of unintended consequences before making pronouncements like this. For most industrialized nations, the first thing to go if they were to abandon 'unsustainable lifestyles" would be all the trinkets imported from China. Sustainable lifestyles are built on domestic production. China would implode faster than the housing bubble.
Posted by: RWV   2008-11-07 12:03  

#3  This guy has the guts to stand in Beijing, gasping for breath, talking about 'unsustainable' policies?
What a choad. What a one-way little mother f*cker.
And when are we going to quit calling China a 'developing country'?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-11-07 12:02  

#2  What a crock of crap.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2008-11-07 11:58  

#1  Why in the hell is China of all ppl preaching about climate change. They alone are prob doing more damge than half the nations on earth combined and i don't remember any US rivers being poisoned this year and how many did they killl before they let the cat out of the bag about that one?
Posted by: chris   2008-11-07 11:11  

00:00