You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Report suggests Obama press Israel over nuclear program
2008-11-16
The Middle East is in danger of accumulating large stocks of nuclear material over the next decade that could be used to produce over 1,700 nuclear bombs, a U.S. research center has projected in a newly released report.

The Institute for Science and International Security, headed by David Albright, one the world's top experts on nuclear weapons and the prevention of nuclear proliferation, recently released its report urging president-elect Barack Obama to take a number of measures to avoid such an outcome, including convincing Israel to halt production of its nuclear weapons.

"The Obama administration should make a key priority of persuading Israel to join the negotiations for a universal, verified treaty that bans the production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium for nuclear explosives, commonly called the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT)," the institute argued. "As an interim step, the United States should press Israel to suspend any production of fissile material for nuclear weapons. Toward this goal, the United States should change its relatively new policy of seeking a cutoff treaty that does not include verification. The Bush administration's rejection of the long-standing U.S. policy of requiring verification was a mistake that the incoming administration needs to rectify."

Though Israel has never publicly admitted it has nuclear arms, it is largely believed to possess about 200 nuclear warheads. Iran has defied the international community for years by running a nuclear program which many observers fear may allow it to obtain nuclear arms in the future.

More recently, several Middle Eastern countries including the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Egypt and Turkey announced their intention of building nuclear power plants.

Though most countries said they want to build reactors in order to reduce their dependency on fossil fuels as their sole source of energy, the institute's researchers believe they also wish to create a nuclear infrastructure in their own countries in light of the possibility that Iran will obtain nuclear arms.

In the year 2020 a number of nuclear reactors in the Middle East are expected to be completed, producing over 13 tons of plutonium. According to the institute, a nuclear device requires only eight kilograms to be assembled.

The institute believes the White House should strive to have Egypt, Iran and Israel ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). It also has stated that the U.S. should discourage the reprocessing of irradiated power reactor fuel both domestically and internationally.
Oh that's just brilliant of them. We can't get the Iranians to stop their progress for a bomb in the first place but we're going to persuade them to ratify the CTBT? The Iranians have to test a bomb when they build it, not only to know if their design works but to demonstrate to the world that they have it and can build more. There's no way in the world the Iranians will sign that away, and Bambi will be delusional if he thinks he can charm the Mad Mullahs™.

The Egyptians will build a bomb if only because they can't stand the thought of the Medes and Persians having something they don't have. As for the Israelis, they don't have to test now, but they're not going to admit to having the bomb so it's irrelevant.
Posted by:john frum

#9  Compare wid PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUM > TRIANGULATING AN ASIAN CONFLICT - Both AL QAEDA + TALIBAN, etc. Islamist Groups are on the verge of securing NUCLEAR BOMBS from Pakistani sources. As RUSSIA, CHINA, INDIA, + OTHER ASIAN NATIONS ARE GEOGRPAHICALLY MUCH CLOSER TO THE MAIN OR MOST POTENT ATMRF ISLAMIST MILITANT-TERROR GROUPS THAN THE USA ANDOR NATO-EU, CHINA + INDIA = NEW RISE OF HAN-HINDU NATIONALISM should induce, not hinder, both impor Asian Nations = Nuclear States into CLOSER, NOT FARTHER OF UNILATERAL, regional milpol cooper to stop the LOOMING REAL THREAT OF ISLAMIST NUCLEARIZATION + likely ISLAMIST NUCLEAR TERROR.

IOW, a NEW 9-11 in America does NOT mean nuclear-ambitious Radical Islam will change from its campaign to destabilize and control large parts of EAST-CENTRAL-SOUTH ASIA.

*SAME > THE UNITED STATES OF ISLAM [Political, Economic, + Military, etc. UNIFIED MUSLIM WORLD]
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-11-16 23:14  

#8  Bad, you disarm the ally for the same reason you take guns away from law abiding citizens.

Posted by: Skunky Glins 5***   2008-11-16 21:47  

#7  "Remember, we're fighting for this Woman's Honour. Which is probably more than she ever did."
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2008-11-16 15:17  

#6  Brilliant, anonymoose. "Bojangles" Fantastic!
Posted by: Verlaine   2008-11-16 13:10  

#5  Lovely.

Turn the light out, and the roaches swarm in.
Posted by: Milton Fandango   2008-11-16 11:39  

#4  I think their proposal should have been that Bojangles should ask the Israelis to tear down their wall, allow free immigration of Muslims into Israel, in exchange for which he will use US taxpayer money to buy them new homes in Freedonia.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-11-16 09:13  

#3  That's almost delusional, as proposals go, if only because international treaties as accepted only bind western powers, commies used to get away from not respecting them scot free, and so do third world countries... the "UN" world order has been a one-way street for quite some time already.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2008-11-16 06:13  

#2  Why Nevil Chamberlain?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2008-11-16 02:47  

#1  Why disarm an ally if negotiations are unable to disarm a hostile regime like Iran?
Posted by: badanov   2008-11-16 01:56  

00:00