You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Democrat Fratricide: Kos (and his Kiddies) declare war on Harry Reid
2008-11-18
"Kos" @ "Daily Kos"

Today's lesson

Jane Hamster Hamsher:

Asked what it would mean if Lieberman kept his chairmanship, one Senate Democratic aide said bluntly: "The left has been foiled again. They can rant and rage but they still do not put the fear into folks to actually change their votes. Their influence would be in question."

I hope this puts to rest the notion that this is all some master stroke of kumbayah, of keeping your friends close and your enemies closer.

This is about telling you that you mean nothing. That democracy is a nice word, but it should never threaten the entitlement of the most exclusive club in the world.

No matter what Joe Lieberman does, the people who are protecting him hate you much more than they hate him.

There's that. But there's also disdain for the American electorate that voted in overwhelming numbers for change from the discredited Bush/McCain/Lieberman policies. But in a city known for tone-deafness, there clearly isn't a more tone-deaf group than the Senate Dems.

I'm done with Reid as Senate leader.

If you thought that was venomous and slightly unhinged, you should see the comments! For example, this gem at FireDogLake:

And what the dems be saying six months from now when Holy Joe is finally holding hearings in his committee, investigating Obama people for firing DHS & DOJ people planted by the bushies? Dammit, dems, we gave you the White House & both houses of Congress, could you possibly be persuaded to use it for the good of ‘we the people’ or will you prove for all time that you only serve the same corporate masters as your ‘opposition’?
Posted by:Mike

#6  Heck, Salvadore Allende of Chile got a narrow plurality over his opponent. From Wiki:

On 4 September 1970, he obtained a narrow plurality of 36.2 percent to 34.9 percent over Jorge Alessandri, a former president, with 27.8 percent going to a third candidate (Radomiro Tomic) of the Christian Democratic Party (PDC).

He took it as a mandate to start his socialist utopia. He nationalized the el Tiniente copper mine without compensation. I worked for Kennecott copper at the time. Kennecott filed suit and injunctions all over the world and tied up all of Allende's copper concentrates. Eventually Allende took a dirt nap because he pi$$ed off the military. A plurality or slight majority does not a mandate make.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2008-11-18 20:47  

#5  52% is a landslide for a Democrat.


52% is an automatic recount, with votes to be taken away, for a Republican.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-11-18 17:48  

#4  Two questions:

52% is overwhleming numbers?
The American people voted for that change?
Posted by: JFM   2008-11-18 16:50  

#3  Hey, did I tell you the one about the Polish Missionary who... was eaten by Harry Reid?
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-11-18 16:46  

#2  In other news, the nutroots are apparently plotting full-out political purges of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice. Will this be on the QT or are we to be enjoying the spectacle of full-on show trials?

Five minute hate session, everybody!
Posted by: Mitch H.   2008-11-18 16:20  

#1  They've got a lot to learn, and if I read my cards correctly, they'll be learning it the hard way from Big O.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-11-18 15:52  

00:00