You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
Egypt willing to fight Somali pirates: minister
2008-11-30
Egypt is willing to intervene militarily against piracy in the Gulf of Aden and off the Somali coast, alone or as part of an international force, a minister said in remarks published on Saturday.

"Egypt is prepared for military intervention if necessary, to protect shipping and tackle the pirates, who can be fought under international law," state newspaper Al-Ahram quoted Moufid Shehab, minister of state for legal and parliamentary affairs, as saying.

Egypt is also ready to take part in an international force, he added.

The Somali-based pirates threaten to cut into Egypt's Suez Canal revenue by pushing ships into using the Cape of Good Hope route around Africa instead of using the canal to travel between Asia and Europe or America. At least three major shipping companies have said in the past few days that their ships would avoid the canal, fearing pirates would capture their ships and hold them for ransom.

Many countries have sent warships to the Gulf of Aden to deter piracy but the area is vast and they cannot prevent every attack. Once the pirates take a ship and hold the crew hostage, any rescue attempt endangers the lives of the crew. Shehab's remarks was the first official sign that Egypt is considering a military response. Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak has said that tackling piracy is the responsibility of the "international community". Naval experts say the Egyptian navy has enough suitable ships to make an effective contribution to an anti-piracy operation.
Posted by:Fred

#5  BTW, this almost an exclusively a European problem and their trading partners in the ME and Asia. Little US trade goes through the Suez Canal and that which does can more easily take the Cape route than Euro trade.
Posted by: phil_b   2008-11-30 21:58  

#4  An Egyptian ship armed with the equivalent of 50-cals has the balls to volunteer for this, but western governments are too scared to get involved at much more than a symbolic level unless shamed into action.

More like the Egyptians see a severe monetary loss, due to decreased Suez Canal traffic. 'Balls' have nothing to do with it.

At this point, proportionally few 'Western' ships have been taken and 'Western' traffic has not been seriously impaired.. Q.E.D., few Western governments see the need to get involved at anything more than a symbolic level.

Insurance rates will rise, just as they did in Southest Asia. The 'Western' nations have alternatives. The Mid-East and Eastern Africa do not. Just as in Southeast Asia, the regional nations are going to have to take matters into their own hands.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-11-30 21:43  

#3  The Baltic Dry Weight shipping index has dropped by an eye-popping 90% this year. Leased ships are cheap at the moment. Increased insurance rates for the Suez route make the Cape route economic.

Egypt has a big problem.
Posted by: phil_b   2008-11-30 19:32  

#2  "Hmm. An Egyptian ship ...has the balls..."
they also have a vested interest in seeing traffic through the canal, something that Western powers don't. as long as the good reach port, someway, it is easier passing on the higher costs to the consumer, rather than actually doing anything about the problem. i personally expect Bambi to pull any USN 'anti-pirate' assets out and deploy elsewhere.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-11-30 19:09  

#1  Hmm. An Egyptian ship armed with the equivalent of 50-cals has the balls to volunteer for this, but western governments are too scared to get involved at much more than a symbolic level unless shamed into action. Hmm.
Posted by: gorb   2008-11-30 14:43  

00:00