You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Homo saps older than previously believed?
2008-12-06
A new study conducted on archeological finds suggests that humans may have evolved over 80,000 years earlier than previously believed.

Dating the stone tools found in the 1970s at the archaeological site of Gademotta, in Ethiopia's Rift Valley, researchers at Berkeley Geochronology Center found that the volcanic ash layers of the site were at least 276,000 years old.

The argon-argon dating - a technique that compares different isotopes of the element argon - showed that the tools were much older than the oldest known Homo sapien bones, which date back to around 195,000 years ago.

The tools are believed to be associated with the emergence of the modern human species, Homo sapiens, the National Geographic reported.

"It seems that we were technologically more advanced at an earlier time that we had previously thought," said study co-author Leah Morgan, from the University of California, Berkeley.

Archeologists believe Gademotta attracted many settlers because of its close proximity to fresh water and its rich resources of a hard, black volcanic glass, known as obsidian. "Due to its lack of crystalline structure, obsidian glass is one of the best raw materials to use for making tools," Morgan explained.

Lack of skeletal remains makes it difficult for archeologists to determine whether Homo sapiens created the Gademotta tools or other human species may have had the required mental and manual abilities to forge them.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Actully she is a Bimbo-Homo from the LSD era.
Posted by: Chief   2008-12-06 21:58  

#8  It is not hard to imagine very intellectual, yet less-technological societies flourishing side by side with what we think of as entirely intellectually primitive societies. And yet we think of them all as cavemen

You just described the whole Middle east.
Posted by: Rednek Jim   2008-12-06 14:39  

#7  Can I watch?
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-12-06 13:42  

#6  She's a homo? Pity for the majority of us guys.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2008-12-06 13:14  

#5  
Chimps, gorillas, and bonobos live, if not side by side, in similar environments. Ditto several species of baboons.


Human evo did not, apparently take place as a matter of linear succession.  No reason there could not have been two or even three vairants living simultaneously.


After all, Peewee Herman and Hulk Hogan are both considered Homo Sap, but if their skeletal remains were discovered a million years from now, the question would be whether Hulk had a pet or Peewee a draft animal.


Anybody who discovers a skeleton more than, say, 100k years old wants to have discovered a new species.  Get their name on it, and all. 


 
Posted by: Richard Aubrey   2008-12-06 10:51  

#4  funny what future archeologists will make of the fact that most of the "humans" currently living in caves wear turbans and live in Pakland
Posted by: Frank G   2008-12-06 10:27  

#3  It has long been known that, at the time of the arrival of Europeans to North America, very culturally advanced tribes existed right next door to very primitive tribes.

While they were all technologically still Stone Age, technology is a poor descriptor of civilization. Some of the primitives were like what we think of as cavemen, living next door to tribes that were intellectually about on a par with the European Age of Reason.

Now extrapolate that to 200,000 years of humanity. It is not hard to imagine very intellectual, yet less-technological societies flourishing side by side with what we think of as entirely intellectually primitive societies. And yet we think of them all as cavemen.

The decisive factor in human evolution appears to be the cultural trait of expansionism. Many more advanced societies seemingly abhorred the idea of leaving their home turf, which ultimately exterminated them. Only when nomadic peoples arose, did humanity start to evolve in earnest.

And when tribes became expansionistic, both cultural and technological development exploded. This is where we see the first traces of nations and history, and when man made the jump from stone to bronze to iron.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-12-06 09:51  

#2  It not a clean lineage. I think we all can vouch by observation that some members of the species have taken the off ramp of the road of evolution.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-12-06 09:34  

#1  Judging by my reaction to Raquel's picture, I'm guessing I'm not a member of the genus Homo.
Posted by: gorb   2008-12-06 02:14  

00:00