You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Cartoon porn kids are people, judge says in Simpsons porn case
2008-12-08
CARTOON characters are people too, a judge has ruled in the case of a man convicted over sexually explicit cartoons based on The Simpsons.

In the New South Wales Supreme Court today, Justice Michael Adams ruled that a fictional cartoon character was a "person" within the meaning of the relevant state and commonwealth laws. Alan John McEwan was appealing his February conviction for possessing child pornography and using his computer to access child pornography.

"The alleged pornography comprised a series of cartoons depicting figures modelled on members of the television animated series The Simpsons," the judge said.

The cartoons showed characters such as Bart, Lisa and Maggie Simpson having sex. McEwan was convicted and fined $3000 and placed on a good behaviour bond.

"In my view, the magistrate was correct in determining that, in respect of both the commonwealth and the NSW offences, the word 'person' included fictional or imaginary characters ...," the judge said. "... The mere fact that the figure depicted departed from a realistic representation in some respects of a human being did not mean that such a figure was not a 'person'."

In dismissing the appeal, the judge ordered each party to pay its own legal costs in the first case dealing with the "difficult" issue
Posted by:tipper

#8  I jes' KNEW that Popeye and Olive Oyl were gettin it on behind Wimpy's back ( "Is that Really a can of spinach in your pocket or are you glad to see me?")
Posted by: USN,Ret.   2008-12-08 22:12  

#7  Pebbles? You mean the disco singer?

http://www.geocities.com/sweettoi/pebbs-1/pebbs07.jpg
Posted by: mojo   2008-12-08 18:27  

#6  This is sick! But showing blue cartoons of Betty Rubble and Pebbles - why, now you have something!!
Posted by: Fritz the Cat   2008-12-08 13:37  

#5  But I'm sure it was argued in that court of law that Bart is now really 28. And a man can't expect to pay the bills forever with T-shirt sales.
Posted by: ed   2008-12-08 12:23  

#4  Surely the press is being grossly indecent in naming the victims of this heinous crime. Have Bart and Lisa got no rights?!!
Posted by: Bulldog   2008-12-08 11:19  

#3  The judge biffed it big time. The cartoons are protected by copyright law, and that's all he needed to invoke.
Posted by: Steve White   2008-12-08 11:04  

#2  How do you 'card' a cartoon?
What about a cartoon that is 17? Would that be statutory cartoon rape? Sexual misconduct with a cartoon?
Silly-ass judges.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-12-08 09:49  

#1  The SCOTUS had the right idea in punting on this one, and declaring that cartoons were not people, despite Jessica Rabbit. It was made clear to them from the start that "When stick figure p*rn is outlawed, only obtuse angles will have s*x."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-12-08 08:55  

00:00