You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Guantanamo closure plan ordered
2008-12-19
Not surprising in a way: our military has plans to do most anything. So Bambi will have a ready-made plan to execute if that's what he wants to do. My preferred option would be to ship all the mooks to Ice Station Zebra ...
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates has ordered plans to be drafted for the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention centre, the Pentagon says.

A team was looking at moving inmates from the facility in a way that continued to protect the American people, a spokesman said. About 250 detainees remain in the controversial Cuba camp.

US President-elect Barack Obama says closing the camp "in a responsible way" is one of his top priorities. Mr Obama, who takes office on 20 January, said earlier this week he aimed to close the facility within two years.
If that's "responsible" ...
Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Mr Gates had wanted to be prepared in case Mr Obama wished to tackle the issue "early in his tenure". "He has asked his team for a proposal on how to shut it down, what will be required specifically to close it and move the detainees from that facility, and at the same time protect the American people from dangerous terrorists," he said.

The Guantanamo Bay prison opened shortly after the attacks of 11 September 2001. Hundreds of men suspected of links to terrorism or al-Qaeda were held without trial as "unlawful enemy combatants". Many are now challenging their detention in civilian courts, after a foolish, unfounded ruling in June by the US Supreme Court.

Some officials have warned that closing the camp would be an extremely complicated process. Those still detained there include men alleged to have planned the 9/11 attacks. How and where they would be detained or tried in the future simply is not clear, reports the BBC's Adam Brookes from Washington.

The incoming president, the Department of Justice and perhaps Congress will need to build a whole new legal process for handling the remaining Guantanamo detainees, our correspondent says.
So that the USSC can declare it unconstitutional. Remember, we've tried this twice already.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  We could just move them about fifty nautical miles due south of Gitmo.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2008-12-19 20:30  

#3  they could send them all too Berkely
Posted by: rabid whitetail   2008-12-19 15:40  

#2  Yep, Steve, the SCOTUS performance on these matters has essentially destroyed the legitimacy of the constitutional process, if viewed honestly. So bad that even Chief Justice Roberts essentially denounced his own court as acting in bad faith. Yet Bush meekly complied, instead of protecting the constitution by refusing to comply, lighting a fire, and putting the court's dereliction in clear relief (heck, even making it an issue on anyone's radar screen).

Nice how mindlessly the BBC and others focus on the facility, as opposed to the fundamental issue, the legal issues. As if "closing" a part of Gitmo does anything about the fundamental issues.

P2K, while you're correct, I believe Congress and the Executive have already blinked (can't recall if it was this particular issue) - didn't they already write the courts out of an issue not long ago, only to have SCOTUS arrogantly continue to meddle?
Posted by: Verlaine   2008-12-19 12:40  

#1  Congress has the Constitutional authority to remove the federal courts from reviewing their next version of the process, if they want to. It's a question of 'will'.
Posted by: P2k on holiday   2008-12-19 09:34  

00:00