You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Obama must get Europe to pay up in the war on terror
2009-01-16
By Ralph Peters

In the spirit of the times, President Obama needs to think like a debt collector: How can he corner strategic deadbeats into paying up?

Europe's behind in its security payments. Fifty years behind. Most of those past debts have been written off, but it's time for the continent to pony up in Afghanistan. The good news is that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is already making the minimum payments due.

NATO likes to advertise that it has over 50,000 troops in Afghanistan, but more than 30,000 of those are US forces. And we intend to double our commitment. NATO's other 25 members contribute less than 40 percent of the International Security Assistance Force. Even that's padded by non-NATO states, such as Australia. It gets worse. Many non-US contingents are restricted from conducting combat missions. They can hand out candy, but they can't send rounds down range.

Before it expires, Obama needs to spend some of his political capital to get Europe to do more. Much more. We've been patient, but the current situation is unacceptable, with our troops and a few brave allies doing the fighting while others drink beer and collect their hazardous-duty pay. Europe "voted" for Obama. It's time for the continent's deadbeats to start giving blood. Obama must get Germans, Italians and Spaniards to fight, get the French to increase their troop commitment to match their rhetoric, and encourage every NATO member to do more.

To be fair, the Brits, the Canadians, the Dutch, the Danes and even the Estonians have been deep in the fight. But other elements - think olive-oil producing countries south of the Alps - reportedly cut their own deals with the Taliban and local warlords: "You don't bother us, and we won't bother you . . . We're just here to show the flag." Afghanistan and NATO can't afford that kind of check kiting.

Essentially, Obama and his security team need to convince Europeans that this fight really is their fight. Afghan opium doesn't come to the US. The old world is far more threatened by Islamist terrorism today than we are. And Europe's own immigrant populations are watching to see who wins. Obama has to "move out sharply," in military parlance. His honeymoon with Europe will last, at most, a year or two. He needs to capitalize on the European belief that he's going to raise the lost continent of Atlantis - before he has to knock down their illusions.

When persuasion doesn't work, he needs to be willing to shame those who expect Americans to die while their troops quaff another Hefeweizen. In the specific case of Germany, enough's enough. It's great that the Germans have finally shown the flag. Now they need to show some guts. The German government had to do things one step at a time, but now it's time to take the step that matters and fight.

The other key player is France. It has skilled troops, and they've done good things but not their fair share. And France is the pilot fish for all the southern NATO states that have avoided serious commitments. President Nicolas Sarkozy has been a disappointment of late, but he has good intentions. He just needs adult supervision. Obama should move fast to get the Energizer Lapin under control. Sarko craves attention. Great. Let's make sure he gets it for the right things. Use him before you lose him.

Above all, our new president needs to reassure NATO and the world that we're not about to quit the fight, that his administration will be as dedicated to fighting Islamist terror as the Bush administration has been.

In a matter of days, the Europeans won't have Bush to kick around anymore. Obama's oath of office should herald the era of no excuses in NATO. He should even consider telling countries that won't let their troops fight that they can go home and suck it. Bush forged his "coalition of the willing" in Iraq. In Afghanistan, Obama needs a "coalition of the killing."
Posted by:ryuge

#7  Col. Peter's thought is part of the zeitgeist, anyway. The Wall Street Journal has any op-ed today on exactly that subject.

Kudos, then, to U.K. Defense Secretary John Hutton for making the stakes clear to his fellow Europeans ahead of Mr. Obama's inauguration Tuesday. "Freeloading on the back of U.S. military security," Mr. Hutton said in a speech last night, "is not an option if we wish to be equal partners in this trans-Atlantic alliance."

Mr. Hutton was most pointed about Afghanistan, a shooting war to which NATO is nominally committed but in which U.S. troops see most of the bullets. "Contributing less doesn't reduce the risks we face," he said. "It only brings less influence." And, in a line that will have many Americans nodding their heads: "It is not right to take the benefit of the insurance cover on offer, if you aren't prepared to pay the premium that goes with it."

The British Defense Secretary's frank talk about Europe's responsibilities in Afghanistan stands in contrast to some comments from the Continent. Within days of Mr. Obama's election victory, German officials were cautioning about the "limits" to the military help they could offer. France, too, has been noncommittal about boosting troop levels significantly. We applaud Mr. Hutton's challenge to his European neighbors, but he may need to make a lot more speeches like last night's to win hearts and minds in Paris and Berlin.


This will be a useful test of President Obama's ability to change the world's view of the U.S.
Posted by: trailing wife    2009-01-16 16:11  

#6  Ditto TW. His profound logic, sense of right, and intense patriotism were threatening to the PC "chain-of-command" while he was on active duty. He is no friend of those set on destroying us. Peters is a brilliant mind, a national treasure.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-01-16 12:36  

#5  I don't think Mr. Peters is starry-eyed about the incoming president, Nimble Spemble. Not only is he a retired Army colonel (Intelligence), but he's been writing useful articles about the war on terror for years. Rather, he is laying out his position on this subject for the next four years.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-01-16 12:15  

#4  Sorry, no blood in that turnip.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-01-16 12:06  

#3  Woozle, he was a success cause he had a free concert. Who's he gonna have for a front band to pull this one off?
Posted by: AlanC   2009-01-16 12:01  

#2  Bambarino was such a success in Germany, wth his big mouth and slick talk, should be no problemo.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter 2700   2009-01-16 11:09  

#1  It is hard to figure of whom Peters has more unrealistic expectations, the EUros or The One.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-01-16 10:36  

00:00