You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Plans to Send Fajr Missiles for Future Gaza Attacks
2009-01-21
Iran has begun an internal probe to examine why the Gaza-based Hamas terrorist organization failed with its numerous rocket barrages to destroy southern Israeli communities or wound more IDF soldiers during Operation Cast Lead.
What's the Aryan word for "ineptitude"?
The Islamic Republic, which has underwritten the cost of training and arming most of Gaza's terrorists, announced plans to ship long-range Fajr missiles into the region to resupply Hamas's depleted arsenal. If fired from Gaza, Fajr missiles, with a range of 70 kilometers (43 miles), would be capable of reaching Tel Aviv and elsewhere in the Gush Dan central region.
Posted by:3dc

#10  According to the Jerusalem Post, the tunnels are already open for smuggling.
Posted by: trailing wife    2009-01-21 22:17  

#9  SR-71, I like this new setting for Tehran...
Posted by: Leroidavid   2009-01-21 22:00  

#8  Tehran
Posted by: SR-71   2009-01-21 21:31  

#7  I wonder if they would have tried this if W were still running the show.
Posted by: gorb   2009-01-21 18:04  

#6   It may be too big for the smuggling tunnels.

It is also too big to ignore. While the Israeli government can treat Katyushas and the occasional Grad landing in the desert as an annoyance, missiles falling in Tel Aviv will demand a response. Note to HamAss: don't be surprised when the IDF shows up for the final time.
Posted by: SteveS   2009-01-21 15:50  

#5  play tit for tat. for every fajr3 or whatever missile hits in israel we should mail them an EVEN BIGGER MISSILE TOO GIVE THEM AS A "GIFT"
Posted by: rabid whitetail   2009-01-21 15:13  

#4  the fajr 3 is a relatively big missile. It may be too big for the smuggling tunnels.
Posted by: mhw   2009-01-21 13:00  

#3  Why isn't this considered a declaration of war?
Because it's just one of many in recent years, and Israel hasn't retaliated yet. When Israel does, I'm sure this will be on the list. Don't count on AP, Rooters, or Al Guardian to remember it though.
Posted by: Darrell   2009-01-21 12:37  

#2  Israel should be within its rights to destroy, out of hand, any Iranian weapons shipment into Gaza along with any Iranians that come with it.

IIRC the Iranians never come with the weapons- they have their training camps inside Iran and bring the fighters to them for training. Clever or cowardly? Or both...
Posted by: Free Radical   2009-01-21 12:28  

#1  Why isn't this considered a declaration of war?
Israel should be within its rights to destroy, out of hand, any Iranian weapons shipment into Gaza along with any Iranians that come with it.
Posted by: AlanC   2009-01-21 11:06  

00:00