You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Military Losses, 1980-2007
2009-01-21
Military Losses, 1980-2007

Whatever your politics, however you lean and however you feel about the current administration, this report is interesting.

As tragic as the loss of any member of the US Armed Forces is, consider the below statistics:

The annual fatalities, by any cause, of military members while actively serving in the armed forces from 1980 through 2006:

1980 2,392 (Carter)
1981 2,380 (Reagan)
1984 1,999 (Reagan)
1988 1,819 (Reagan)
1989 1,636 (George H W)
1990 1,508 (George H W)
1991 1,787 (George H W)
1992 1,293 (George H W)
1993 1,213 ( Clinton )
1994 1,075 ( Clinton )
1995 2,465 ( Clinton )
1996 2,318 ( Clinton )
1997 817 ( Clinton )
1998 2,252 ( Clinton )
1999 1,984 ( Clinton )
2000 1,983 ( Clinton )
2001 890 (George W)
2002 1,007 (George W)
2003 1,410 (George W)
2004 1,887 (George W)
2005 919 (George W)
2006 920 (George W)
2007 899 (George W)

Clinton years (1993-2000): 14,107 deaths
George W years (2001-2007): 7,932 deaths

Are you surprised when you look at these figures? They indicate the loss from the two latest Middle East conflicts are less than the loss of military personnel during Clinton 's presidency when America wasn't even involved in a war--unless you include Bosnia and Mogadishu , Somalia . (Remember "Blackhawk Down"?) Even more surprising is that in 1980, during Carter presidency, there were 2,392 US military fatalities!

These figures appear to indicate many members of our media and politicians pick and choose the information on which they report--that they present only those "facts" that support their agenda.

Consider the latest census of Americans. It shows the following distribution of American citizens by race:

European descent 69.12 percent
Hispanic 12.50 percent
Black 12.30 percent
Asian 3.70 percent
Native American 1.00 percent
Other 2.60 percent

Many members of the media lead us to believe the military death ratio is off balanced compared to the distribution by race in America . Here are the fatalities by race over the past three years in Iraqi Freedom.

European descent 74.31 percent
Hispanic 10.74 percent
Black 9.67 percent
Asian 1.81 percent
Native American 1.09 percent
Other 0.33 percent

Surprised again?

Hopefully, intelligent Americans can decipher--

the facts from the spin.
the spinners from the leaders.
those who seek even more power from those that seek justice.
the dividers from the uniters.

These statistics are published by the Congressional Research Service and may be confirmed at: www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf

"History does not entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." Dwight D. Eisenhower

Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Thanks Todd
Posted by: Large Snerong7311   2009-01-21 23:06  

#5  bigjim, not sure how they do things in kentucky, but it' a good idea to make sure yu don't look like an idiot before calling someone a dipshit.

As "Large Snerong7311" said, look at the ACTUAL file at www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf
and learn that the numbers posted don't correspond to the actual data. Besoeker just fell victim to some good ol' fashioned fuzzy numbers. A the very least, if something looks fishy, it probably is--a good lesson to keep in mind.
Posted by: Todd   2009-01-21 22:12  

#4  bigjim, not sure how they do things in kentucky, but it' a good idea to make sure yu don't look like an idiot before calling someone a dipshit.

As "Large Snerong7311" said, look at the ACTUAL file at www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf
and learn that the numbers posted don't correspond to the actual data. Besoeker just fell victim to some good ol' fashioned fuzzy numbers. A the very least, if something looks fishy, it probably is--a good lesson to keep in mind.
Posted by: Todd   2009-01-21 22:12  

#3  What's your point dipshit.
The numbers don't lie, if you are inferring that Besoeker is bullshitting us you better have some pretty substantial documentation.

Posted by: bigjim-ky   2009-01-21 21:38  

#2  It makes me sick when my side engage on this.

If you check the pdf that numbers posted here are a lie:

The PDF numbers are this:
1980 2,392
1981 2,380
1982 2,319
1983 2,465
1984 1,999
1985 2,252
1986 1,984
1987 1,983
1988 1,819
1989 1,636
1990 1,507
1991 1,787
1992 1,293
1993 1,213
1994 1,075
1995 1,040
1996 974
1997 817
1998 827
1998 827
1999 796
2000 758
2001 891
2002 999
2003 1,228
2004 1,874
2005 1,942
2006 1,858

The argument is rather stupid too. In War and defending a country it is normal there are casualities.
Posted by: Large Snerong7311   2009-01-21 19:46  

#1  Whoa. You mean to tell me that what the MSM is telling us is a big lie? I am not surprised.
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-01-21 18:36  

00:00