You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Global warming 'irreversible' for next 1,000 years
2009-01-28
Climate change is "largely irreversible" for the next 1,000 years even if carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions could be abruptly halted, according to a new study led by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

The study's authors said there was "no going back" after the report showed that changes in surface temperature, rainfall and sea level are "largely irreversible for more than 1,000 years after CO2 emissions are completely stopped." NOAA senior scientist Susan Solomon said the study, published in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal, showed that current human choices on carbon dioxide emissions are set to "irreversibly change the planet."
Okay then, screw it. There's no point to changing our ways so why bother?
Researchers examined the consequences of CO2 building up beyond present-day concentrations of 385 parts per million, and then completely stopping emissions after the peak. Before the industrial age CO2 in Earth's atmosphere amounted to only 280 parts per million. The study found that CO2 levels are irreversibly impacting climate change, which will contribute to global sea level rise and rainfall changes in certain regions. The authors emphasised that increases in CO2 that occur from 2000 to 2100 are set to "lock in" a sea level rise over the next 1,000 years.

Effects: Rising sea levels would cause "irreversible commitments to future changes in the geography of the Earth, since many coastal and island features would ultimately become submerged," the study said. Decreases in rainfall that last for centuries can be expected to have a range of impacts, said the authors. Regional impacts include - but are not limited to - decreased human water supplies, increased fire frequency, ecosystem change and expanded deserts.
Posted by:Fred

#16  Is she sure it's gonna take 1000 years to warm us all up? Winter's up in a few weeks and I want to heat up NOW, dammit!
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-01-28 18:32  

#15  But even if the planet is dying, why am I meant to care?
Posted by: Injun Spomoper6133   2009-01-28 17:23  

#14  Just finished shoveling a foot of irreversible global warming out of my driveway.
Posted by: DMFD   2009-01-28 16:13  

#13  2 degrees here. Thank goodness we can reverse that.
Posted by: Icerigger   2009-01-28 13:27  

#12  

Al Gore is a modern day Elmer Gantry, just a different twist on Fire & Brimstone. He's running a traveling tent show and fleecing the faithful.

Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2009-01-28 12:31  

#11  Which means "Grant money 'irreversible' for next 1,000 years".
Don't kill the job, boys and girls...
Posted by: tu3031   2009-01-28 11:24  

#10  So I need to buy a beach house that is setback from the water another few inches?
Posted by: Jating Black8373   2009-01-28 10:42  

#9  Susan Solomon, Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley, 1981 -- need I say more?
Posted by: Darrell   2009-01-28 09:44  

#8  YEAH!!!

My Hummer driving, bean eating and methane producing ass is victorious!!!

BRUHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-01-28 07:36  

#7  A lifetime spent dealing with engineers and scientists has taught me one overarching truth: You can prove anything if you can pick your data set.

These people have social agendas which they have been pushing since the fall of the Soviet Union and are becoming increasingly shrill and bombastic as it becomes apparent to people that it is getting colder. They have a very short time to try and get their legislative agenda enacted and salvage their reputations before it becomes apparent that they are nothing but politicized grant whores and propaganda spewing simpletons. The claims will get even more apocalyptic (and less provable) as the sands run out on the public's acceptance of the global warming hype.
Posted by: rwv   2009-01-28 07:29  

#6  Hubristic arrogance on so many levels. Pride goeth before the fall.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-01-28 07:05  

#5  And then there's this:
"the authors find that the irreversible global average sea level rise by the year 3000 would be at least 1.3–3.2 feet (0.4–1.0 meter) if our cockamamie scheme is correct CO2 peaks at 600 parts per million, and double that amount if CO2 peaks at 1,000 parts per million."

That will average out to 1 mm per year. Or maybe 2 mm. OH NOES!

Good thing Joel will be safe up in the Satellite of Love.
Posted by: eLarson   2009-01-28 06:22  

#4  Algore = Epic Fail. Again.
Posted by: eLarson   2009-01-28 06:11  

#3  There's nothing to reverse.
Posted by: gorb   2009-01-28 02:48  

#2  You are only angry about that "needing to be a Private Corporation so you would not have that GM economy where your jet beat your cars to Washington DC. Let's go Green Nancy. Give up your plane. Ride your unicorn or hotel grass top carpets to the rescue.

Call Kucinich, there was a UFO at the inagural.

BAH!
Posted by: newc   2009-01-28 02:18  

#1  Aaaawwww, NO SIMSPON's "REVEREND LOVEJOY" running down Springfield yelling "Its all over, people"!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-01-28 01:17  

00:00