You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
In which Judge Baltasar Garzon breaks my heart
2009-03-29
Yeah, I know. I wuz warned.
A Spanish court has agreed to consider opening a criminal case against six former Bush administration officials, including former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, over allegations they gave legal cover for torture at Guantanamo Bay, a lawyer in the case said Saturday.

Human rights lawyers brought the case before leading anti-terror judge Baltasar Garzon, who agreed to send it on to prosecutors to decide whether it had merit, Gonzalo Boye, one of the lawyers who brought the charges, told The Associated Press.

The ex-Bush officials are Gonzales; former undersecretary of defense for policy Douglas Feith; former Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff David Addington; Justice Department officials John Yoo and Jay S. Bybee; and Pentagon lawyer William Haynes.

Yoo declined to comment. A request for comment left with Feith through his Hudson Institute e-mail address was not immediately returned.

Spanish law allows courts to reach beyond national borders in cases of torture or war crimes under a doctrine of universal justice, though the government has recently said it hopes to limit the scope of the legal process.

Garzon became famous for bringing charges against former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in 1998, and he and other Spanish judges have agreed to investigate alleged abuses everywhere from Tibet to Argentina's "dirty war," El Salvador and Rwanda.

Still, the country's record in prosecuting such cases has been spotty at best, with only one suspect extradited to Spain so far.

When a similar case was brought against Israeli officials earlier this year, Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos assured his Israeli counterpart that the process would be quashed.

Even if indictments are eventually handed down against the U.S. officials, it is far from clear whether arrests would ever take place. The officials would have to travel outside the United States and to a country willing to take them into custody before possible extradition to Spain.
Kinda like extraordinary rendition, without the Chloroform.
Boye said he expected the National Court to take the case forward, and dismissed concerns that it would harm bilateral relations between the two countries. He said that some of the victims of the alleged torture were Spaniards, strengthening the argument for Spanish jurisdiction. "When you bring a case like this you can't stop to make political judgments as to how it might affect bilateral relations between countries," he told the AP." It's too important for that."

Boye noted that the case was brought not against interrogators who might have committed crimes but by the lawyers and other high-placed officials who gave cover for their actions. "Our case is a denunciation of lawyers, by lawyers, because we don't believe our profession should be used to help commit such barbarities," he said.

Another lawyer with detailed knowledge of the case told the AP that Garzon's decision to consider the charges was "a significant first step." The lawyer spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the media.

There was no immediate comment from Garzon or the government.

The judge's decision to send the case against the American officials to prosecutors means it will proceed, at least for now. Prosecutors must now decide whether to recommend a full-blown investigation, though Garzon is not bound by their decision.

The proceedings against the Bush Administration officials could be embarrassing for Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, who has been keen to improve ties with the United States after frosty relations during the Bush Administration Zapatero is scheduled to meet President Barack Obama for the first time on April 5 during a summit in Prague.
Time to go to the barricades, like Bashir's constituents. Anyone want to chant some "anti-Spanish court" slogans with me?
Posted by:Seafarious

#10  "Human rights lawyers brought the case before leading anti pro-terror judge Baltasar Garzon..."

There we go.
Posted by: Parabellum   2009-03-29 18:41  

#9  "It looks like he is a tax cheat."

Well, then, JFM - that settles it.

Garzon is qualified for a position in Bambi's Administration.

Lucky us.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-03-29 17:02  

#8  The US has, IIRC, three military bases in Spain. One is Rota Naval Base, and the other two are Zaragoza AB and Torrejon AB. Each of the air bases has a fighter wing assigned to NATO. ROTA provides both a port and an airfield where P-3C Orions are based for ASW work. It would inconvenience us a bit, but I'm sure those facilities can be closed and all US military personnel transferred elsewhere with little loss of capability. Spain needs to understand that Mutual Assistance treaties mean that both parties are responsible for assuring the assistance of the other, including squashing stupid cases like this at the earliest opportunity and punishing those that do stupid things.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-03-29 16:53  

#7  First of all: Garzon is what the european judiciaries calls an instruction judge, that is he leads and coordinates investigations on crimes but he is not supposed to try to indict suspects but to look for elements both favourable and unfavourable to the suspect. That is why he is called a "juez" (judge) and not a fiscal (Prosecution Attorney).


Garzon has been the man who

-Tried to indict Pinochet

-Was number 2 od the Socialist Party (you could think this should have been incompatible with his job).

-Has time and again neglected the cases he was invetigating reslting in criminals habing been released because he didn't sign the prolongations to their preventive jail

-Decided to investigate the crimes perpetrated by the victorious side during the Spanish Civil War. That is 70 years ago. Of course they have prescribed. So he requalified them as genocide. Of course he wasn't interested in the crimes perpetrated by the losing side (Spain became a virtual Sovit Republic with NKVD agents openly arresting and killing people). He asked for the death certificate of Franco in order no to summon him. At one point the adults in Spanish judiciary forced him to desist.

-He is suspected to have warned Basque terrorists of an operation against them.

-He strted an uinvestigaqtion against the opposition party just before regional elections. He had zero as zilch nada elements, it was pure fluff to influence election outcome. During the investigation he was seen dining and hunting with the Justice Minister and the high ranked cop leading the investigation. The Minister had no hunting licence and was forced to resign (BTW, Garzon's official income does not allow him to spend the thoudaqns of dollars it was supposed to cost). Minister was forced to resign and the adult superviors forced Garzon to desist from the investigation (who anyway was out of his jurisdiction).

-It loooks like he is a tax cheat.

The truth is that in the last five years he hasn't had a single success and all his investigations haéd been either forcefully closed or taken to other judges who closed them after noting there was no clues and/or nothing to prosecute.

In fact the only thing who has prevented him being expelled from the judiciary and possibly jailed for violating the law and using its attributions for illegitimate goals (like proppiong the Socialist Party friom which he is a member) had been the caste spirit of his peers. But this caste spirit hasn't gone far enough to prevent him from time and again having his cases removed from his hands.
Posted by: JFM   2009-03-29 13:19  

#6  *and a sh*tload of Texans and other assorted Americans - all armed to the teeth

Count me as one.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-03-29 11:27  

#5  Reminds me of when some bus stop in Vermont declares a nuclear freeze or an Iraqi "journalist" throws a shoe.
Posted by: regular joe   2009-03-29 10:16  

#4  "So Obama being a Tranzi will he extradite the ex-Bush officials to Spain?"

Secret Service* still protects Bush - it would be interesting to see Bambi try....

*and a sh*tload of Texans and other assorted Americans - all armed to the teeth
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-03-29 09:54  

#3  perhaps someone can explain to this tool that he's a minor-league figure in a second-ranked country on their way to the economic shitpile? Take him hunting with Darth Cheney
Posted by: Frank G   2009-03-29 08:57  

#2  My only surprise is that someone beat Henry Waxman to the punch.
Posted by: Raj   2009-03-29 08:17  

#1  So Obama being a Tranzi will he extradite the ex-Bush officials to Spain?

Just want to be clear about his position. American or Tranzi? Which is it?
Posted by: 3dc   2009-03-29 00:46  

00:00