You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
US spy agencies hamstrung by turf battles - Still?
2009-04-02
US spy agencies are still hamstrung by the same turf battles and financial mismanagement that led to massive intelligence failures revealed by the 9/11 attacks and the Iraq war, an internal report has found.

The report, made public on Wednesday, was the most detailed of its kind on challenges facing the 16 spy agencies.

It came four years after the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was created to remedy them.

"The culture of protecting 'turf' remains a problem, and there are few, if any, consequences for failure to collaborate," said the report, which was completed by the DNI's inspector general in November, before President Barack Obama was sworn in as the new US president.

It also criticized what it called poor financial management by the DNI, saying that most of the intelligence agencies are "struggling to achieve auditable financial statements."

The US intelligence budget has seen a dramatic increase in recent years, and topped 43.5 billion dollars in fiscal 2007, which ended in September.

The report outlined the many challenges facing Obama's director of national intelligence, Admiral Dennis Blair.

The agencies have complained that the Director of National Intelligence "sends duplicative taskings and conflicting messages to the IC (intelligence community), thereby undermining the ODNI's credibility and fueling assertions that the ODNI is just an 'additional layer of bureaucracy,'" the report said.

"The lack of clear communication to the IC of the ODNI staff's authorities has encouraged some agencies to go their own way, to the detriment of the unified and integrated intelligence enterprise."

The report also found that the intelligence office had failed to present a vision for how the spy agencies should function.

Lawmakers reacted with dismay at the findings.

"We have been repeatedly disappointed by the lack of clarity in the role of the DNI," said California Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, who chaired a hearing Wednesday by a House Intelligence subcommittee.

"There's still not a clear mission from ODNI, and this is one of the things that's concerned a lot of us," said Republican Congresswoman Sue Myrick.

DNI inspector general Edward Maguire told the congressional panel that the spy director's role as the top intelligence adviser to the president had hampered his management responsibilities.

"He doesn't have to do it personally every day and ... he could do this in more of an oversight type of capacity," Maguire said.

"In a way the creation of the ODNI was a little bit like, sort of like a corporate merger," Maguire explained. "When you do that, many, many mergers fail."
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#7  I believe this will be a routine 'pop-up' issue as long as DoD is successful in resisting politicized outside agencies from taking over their primacy in tactical intel [directly accessible and required by local combat commanders]. There was a go around on this a couple years back and the 'Intel Czar' lost to DoD. Centralization comes at a cost of tactical efficiency. It won't happen till actual war fighting is a distant memory [which is about 3 months in MSM time].
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-04-02 23:52  

#6  They should use the private enterprise model. Create two groups, a blue and a gold group for each function. The one that is most successful gets the funding. Force them to compete. If you do not succeed, you do not get funding and you fade away or have your resources diverted to the more successful group.
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-04-02 23:28  

#5  300 different agencies trying to manage the same piece of pie.

OF COURSE THERE ARE GONNA BE TURF BATTLES!!!!

Roll the same types into one agency and the problem will be reduced. For out-of-nation, all get rolled into the NSA. ATF, HS get rolled into the FBI. They share info. If the terrorist comes into the US, the NSA can share all data with the FBI and vice versa.
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-04-02 23:06  

#4  (Picture)
Everybody was kung fu fighting,
And it was fast as lightning,
In fact a little bit frightening,
But they did it with expert timing.
On Ho Ho Ho
Posted by: Galactic Coordinator redneck Jim   2009-04-02 22:48  

#3  ION "TURF", WORLD MIL FORUM > IIUC INDIA AND CHINA WANT AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN AS THEIR OWN.

Just waiting on RUSSIA, + ISLAMISTS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-04-02 21:27  

#2  the chinese don't have any strings attached too hacking our comps why should we?
Posted by: Mt Dew addiction   2009-04-02 17:50  

#1  They are failing!! I tell you under Bush they failed! I, the big O, will fix it.

We have not had an attack since 911.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2009-04-02 17:36  

00:00