You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Obama declines to take "yes" for an answer on detaining terrorists
2009-04-23
Jeb Babbin reports that "White House lawyers are refusing to accept the findings of an inter-agency committee that the Uighur Chinese Muslims held at Guantanamo Bay are too dangerous to release inside the U.S."
Put them in Detroit. Couldn't get worse ...
After President Obama promised to close Gitmo, the White House ordered an inter-agency review of the status of all the detainees. Apparently, it believed that many of those held would be quickly determined releasable. If so, this belief was perhaps naive, considering that a large percentage of the detainees, presumably the comparatively "innocuous" ones, had already been released (some of whom promptly returned to their terrorist ways).

The inter-agency committee -- comprised of all the national security agencies -- was told to start with what the Obama administration believed to be the easiest case, that of the seventeen Chinese Muslims, known as Ughurs, who were captured at an al-Queda training camp.

According to Babbin, the inter-agency panel found that the Ughurs weren't "the ignorant, innocent goatherds the White House believed them to be."
Scales fall from our eyes ...
The committee determined they were too dangerous to release because they were members of the ETIM terrorist group, the "East Turkistan Islamic Movement," and because their presence at the al-Queda training camp was no accident (realistically, how could it have been).
That's the sort of coincidence that's almost a religion in the Bambi administration's foreign policy think tank ...
Babbin's sources in the Defense Department say that "the White House legal office has told the inter-agency review group to re-do their findings to come up with the opposite answer."

Would anyone be surprised if, indeed, the Obama administration is overruling the intelligence community in order to implement preconceived policy preferences? Would anyone be surprised if those policy preferences include erring on the side of aiding suspected terrorists (to "repair our image," of course) rather than protecting the United States?
We've been educated that last eight years that it's not right to put 'politics' before facts. Apparently that's now wrong.
As Babbin puts it, "there is now no ETIM terrorist cell in the United States: there will be one if these Uighurs are released into the United States."
Posted by:Beavis

#4  
Posted by: Don Vito Anginegum8261   2009-04-23 21:19  

#3  If they release the Uighars in America, the Chinese will kill every damn one of them as high priority targets. They do NOT want them on the lecture circuit in the US, telling us of how the Chinese are demographically exterminating them by flooding their lands with Chinese.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-04-23 19:59  

#2  No surprises here.
Posted by: Slifernickdegoric   2009-04-23 13:40  

#1  Soon as B.O. closes Gitmo, look for him to give it to Castro.
Posted by: U. O. Money   2009-04-23 10:59  

00:00