You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
The Obama administration is having trouble finding Community Organizers for Afghanistan
2009-04-23
The Obama administration is having trouble finding the hundreds of civilians it wants to bolster its troop buildup in Afghanistan, so military reservists might be asked to do many of the jobs.

In announcing the new strategy for the war last month, the administration said it would send several hundred civilians ? such as agronomists, economists and legal experts ? to work on reconstruction and development issues as part of the military's counterinsurgency campaign.

Defense Department press secretary Geoff Morrell said Thursday that the military is trying to find ways to fill the gap. That would likely be with reservists, who often have the necessary skills because of the experience they have in their civilian lives, other officials said.

"It's just a realization that they are not going to be able to provide the 'civilian surge' in the near future and the need is now," Morrell said. "We're looking at ways to step into the breach and figure out how we can get additional personnel there to help out on the civilian side," Morrell said.

In another development, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told Congress Thursday that local job creation is a key purpose of the $980 million in extra funds the State Department is requesting for its work in Afghanistan.

Clinton was testifying before a House appropriations subcommittee that is reviewing the administration's request for $7.1 billion in additional funds for the State Department this budget year.

She said the main goal is to improve security at the local level in Afghanistan by putting more people to work. And she said the Obama administration believes that many in the Taliban insurgency who are fighting against American and Afghan forces are motivated more by money than by ideology.

The phenomenon of looking to the military is far from new and was a sore point in Iraq as well after the Pentagon was asked to do tasks the State Department lacked staff to do. The military, among government departments, has long had more money to train and hire people and a greater ability to order its employees to war zones and other hardship posts.

The Obama administration over the coming months is sending about 17,000 additional combat troops and 4,000 more trainers to mentor Afghan security forces ? a buildup long delayed by the war in Iraq as the Afghan campaign became more and more violent in recent years.

Officials haven't released the number of civilians wanted to bolster the new effort and have said there is no firm number yet. But two officials said privately that the number of 500 to 600 was being considered at one point as the new war strategy was being developed in recent months.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#10  Be a real leader Obama, go first, we'll follow. (Snicker)
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-04-23 21:37  

#9  John QC, you beat me to it lol. Yes, send ACORN.
Posted by: Jan   2009-04-23 19:51  

#8  Need community organizers in Afghanistan? Send ACORN to Afghanistan. Might take care of a problem at home--multiple voting and voting by fictitious people and dead people . Probably won't do much for Afghanistan.
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-04-23 19:16  

#7  ..not only willing but capable.

I wasn't just referring to 'boots on the ground', P2K.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-04-23 16:12  

#6  The Obama administration is having trouble finding the hundreds of civilians it wants to bolster its troop buildup in Afghanistan, so military reservists might be asked to do many of the jobs.

Not flocking to "the cause" are they? Not very Hopey Changey of them. And isn't that a big surprise...
Posted by: tu3031   2009-04-23 15:43  

#5  That is one hell of a toxic belief. What kind of contorted thought process comes up with this BS rhetoric that gainful employment will dissolve the Arab and Muslim ideology of hatred and violence toward anyone not like them?

Because you see Islam means Peace and Love and Harmony and Flowers and CoolRain and stuff. So they can't really really want to kill us, rape our women and enslave our children. If we simply send in community organizers and sing happy songs and think happy thoughts they will, like, come to love us and we can gather around and sing campfire songs.

/SARC

Obama is going to get a lot of people killed. And ORDERING military reservists in like this ( and probably unarmed to boot - cause guns are icky ) is going to get a lot of very good people killed.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-04-23 15:28  

#4  ..the Obama administration believes that many in the Taliban insurgency who are fighting against American and Afghan forces are motivated more by money than by ideology.

That is one hell of a toxic belief. What kind of contorted thought process comes up with this BS rhetoric that gainful employment will dissolve the Arab and Muslim ideology of hatred and violence toward anyone not like them?

We are beyond screwed.


Posted by: Zorba Craising6734   2009-04-23 15:00  

#3  $7.1 billion in additional funds for the State Department this budget year.

Funding follows ability and effectiveness. Were State's or USAID budgets cut because they were unwilling to do the tasks assigned them? Why not?
Posted by: ed   2009-04-23 12:41  

#2  ..not only willing but capable. Whether we like it or not, the best we have are in the uniform services not any place else in the rest of the bureaucracy or academia or the media. Better to do it right the first time than over and over again just to make someone happy about appearances.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-04-23 11:52  

#1  The phenomenon of looking to the military is far from new and was a sore point in Iraq as well after the Pentagon was asked to do tasks the State Department lacked willing staff to do.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-04-23 11:38  

00:00