You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
ElBaradei: Attack on Iran would be insane
2009-05-17
A strike on Iran would be 'insane,' Mohamed ElBaradei, chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said in a German magazine interview released on Saturday. Tehran should engage with the United States and negotiate over its nuclear program, he said.

"It would be completely insane to attack Iran," ElBaradei said. "That would turn the region into one big fireball, and the Iranians would immediately start building the bomb - and they could count on the support of the entire Islamic world."
"Well, support from me and the IAEA at least - that should count for something."
Boy howdy, I guess that means the Iranians aren't working on a bomb now. Who knew?
US President Barack Obama is actively seeking to engage Iran on a series of issues, from its nuclear program to Afghanistan.

"I advise my Iranian negotiating partners: grasp the hand that Obama is extending to you," ElBaradei told Der Spiegel . Asked what he meant exactly, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog added: "I think Freeze for Freeze is the next realistic step. The Iranians would install no more centrifuges, the West would forego further sanction measures. During this time, there would be intensive negotiations."
"And the sprites on my personal staff will sprinkle happy dust."
The United Nations Security Council has imposed three rounds of sanctions on Iran for refusing to halt enrichment. Obama's administration has made clear that any overtures to Iran will be accompanied by ramped up sanctions if there is no cooperation.
Posted by:Pappy

#9  ISRAELI MIL FORUM > ISRAEL: IRAN CLOSE TO DEVELOPING NUCLEAR ARMS. It has the capacity to do so, within one year or less, but is no quick/immediate rush to do so at this time.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-05-17 19:45  

#8  No, Besoeker, because that is just calling for killing Juices and Juicesses, which is ok these days.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-05-17 15:37  

#7  "It would be completely insane to attack Iran," ElBaradei said.

Wonner wat he has to say about the endless drone and chant of the Mooslim world for the.... attack and destruction of the State of Israel? Is that an "insane" concept as well?
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-05-17 13:45  

#6  Yes, it would be insane. And it would throw the region into an even bigger uproar than already exists. But is that worse than what you get with an Iran equipped with nukes? Note that not just the Israelis, but the Egyptians and Saudis are concerned about nuclear mullahs in Iran.

In the real world, your choices are not always between good and bad outcomes. More often, it is between worse and worser.
Posted by: SteveS   2009-05-17 13:35  

#5  Oooo, Rambler - that description just makes my heart go pitter-pat. :-D

From your keyboard to the Israelis' jets....
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-05-17 09:20  

#4  EPIC FAIL!
Posted by: Parabellum   2009-05-17 09:12  

#3  The icing on top of this cake-of-insanty is the fact that ElBaradei is in the position he is in. The rest I understand, even though it is irrational.
Posted by: gorb   2009-05-17 03:24  

#2  the Iranians would immediately start building the bomb
Kind of tough to do when your nuclear facilities, many of the nuclear scientists, and perhaps most of Qom are smoking radioactive craters.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-05-17 01:19  

#1  """A strike on Iran would be 'insane,' """
As if allowing the Mullas to holde control IS sane.

bah.
Posted by: newc   2009-05-17 00:22  

00:00