You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Nepali Parliament Elects New Prime Minister
2009-05-24
In Nepal, a veteran communist leader, Madhav Kumar Nepal, has been elected as the country's new prime minister, ending a political deadlock which followed the resignation of Maoist Prime Minister Prachanda. But the tiny Himalayan country's political problems are far from over.
Why a communist? Haven't they any royalists lying about?
The speaker of parliament Subhash Nemwang declared Madhav Kumar Nepal elected to the post of prime minister unopposed on Saturday evening. Fifty-six-year-old Mr. Nepal heads one of the country's oldest parties known as the Communist Party of Nepal - United Marxist Leninist. He will lead an alliance of 22 parties.
Not just a communist but a Marxist-Leninist? How is this an improvement over the Maoist they just got rid of?
The alliance was put together after the exit of Maoist Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, popularly known as Prachanda. Prachanda resigned earlier this month after the president overturned his party's decision to sack the army chief, who had refused to integrate former rebel fighters into the army. Since then the country has been in political limbo, as the Maoists demanded that the president quit, disrupted parliament, and blocked the formation of a new government.

The Maoists agreed to lift their protests earlier this week allowing a vote to be held on Saturday. However, Maoists stormed out of parliament before the vote, calling the selection of a new leader a "farce."

Their absence highlights the many challenges the new prime minister faces. He has to oversee the drafting of a new constitution for the country, scheduled to be completed by next year. But the job will be difficult without the cooperation of the Maoists who are the single largest party, and control 40 percent of the seats in parliament.
I don't suppose the king will be invited back. As I recall, that was a bit of a disaster.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  this new PM lost his seat in the last election, in fact he lost from two seat, however he became CA member but people didn't elect him, are we sure Nepal has democracy!!!!
Posted by: Glavimp the Weasel8719   2009-05-24 18:41  

#2  The king and the rest of the royal family were killed by his son, the crown prince, over some girl he wanted to marry. The king was well liked and held Nepal together. The successor (dead king's brother?) was the disaster, allowing the Communists to take over.
Posted by: ed   2009-05-24 13:25  

#1  A good king wouldnt be so bad, but that last PIG they had as their king, the one who had his family killed in the dinner time shoot out, was the begining of the end for the nepalis.
Posted by: 746   2009-05-24 11:17  

00:00