You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
India-Pakistan
Villagers besiege 200 Taliban in Dir
2009-06-08
Hundreds of tribesmen furious over a deadly suicide bombing at a mosque have laid siege to around 200 Taliban in Upper Dir, killing 13 in total -- nine of them on Sunday, according to officials and a private TV channel.
We had this story yesterday. This adds detail.
The weekend clashes appeared to be the latest evidence of growing anti-Taliban sentiment in Pakistan -- a shift that comes as suicide attacks have surged and the military wages an offensive in the nearby Swat valley. The attack on the mosque killed 33 worshippers during Friday prayers, angering residents of the Haya Gai area of Upper Dir.

Some 400 villagers banded together to attack five villages in the nearby Dhok Darra area that were known Taliban strongholds, said DCO Atifur Rehman. He said the citizens' lashkar has occupied three of the villages since Saturday, and was trying to push the Taliban out of the other two on Sunday. Some 20 houses of villagers suspected of harbouring Taliban were destroyed, he added. "They are standing up against the militants themselves as they consider them troublemakers," Atif told Reuters over the telephone.

Around 200 Taliban were putting up a tough fight, but were surrounded by the villagers.
District police Chief Ejaz Ahmad said around 200 Taliban were putting up a tough fight, but were surrounded by the villagers. One resident of Upper Dir said, "We are Muslims ... we don't want them, they have to go. Attacking a mosque is not Islam. They're not Muslim."

Tribal elder Mohtabar Khan said letting the Taliban stay was asking for trouble. "It means inviting a military offensive which we don't want."
Posted by:Fred

#4  man i love too see the locals kicking their asses. I know we gave them weapons in the past give them more if they will kill eacj other off
Posted by: funky skunk   2009-06-08 18:39  

#3  Note that so-called counter-insurgency experts have been saying the Pakistani approach - flatten everything in the insurgency's base of operations - only alienates civilians and drives them into the arms of the insurgency (which goes against every bit of history I've read). In reality, if you put enough pressure on the civilian population, they will give up the people they are sheltering. This is how the Chinese and Soviet Communists defeated the guerrillas - by punishing civilians who tolerated their presence. Thousands of years before Marxism and/or Leninism, collective punishment was how defeated kings were located and killed (typically along with the entire royal bloodline).
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2009-06-08 14:57  

#2  Tribal elder Mohtabar Khan said letting the Taliban stay was asking for trouble. "It means inviting a military offensive which we don't want."

See? It works.
Posted by: gorb   2009-06-08 00:53  

#1  The message should be: "We can do executions too, but you won't have to bother with a march over to the public square before we off you..."
Posted by: M. Murcek   2009-06-08 00:05  

00:00