You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Obama Closes Doors on Openness
2009-06-21
IN Which another newsie has a "Wait. What?!?" moment. At this rate, will the president have any fans by the end of this term?
As a senator, Barack Obama denounced the Bush administration for holding "secret energy meetings" with oil executives at the White House. But last week public-interest groups were dismayed when his own administration rejected a Freedom of Information Act request for Secret Service logs showing the identities of coal executives who had visited the White House to discuss Obama's "clean coal" policies. One reason: the disclosure of such records might impinge on privileged "presidential communications." The refusal, approved by White House counsel Greg Craig's office, is the latest in a series of cases in which Obama officials have opted against public disclosure. Since Obama pledged on his first day in office to usher in a "new era" of openness, "nothing has changed," says David -Sobel, a lawyer who litigates FOIA cases. "For a president who said he was going to bring unprecedented transparency to government, you would certainly expect more than the recycling of old Bush secrecy policies."
At least he is recycling. One can hear the disgruntled Humph! in Mr. Sobel's statement... and in the journalist's choice of quote.
The hard line appears to be no accident. After Obama's much-publicized Jan. 21 "transparency" memo, administration lawyers crafted a key directive implementing the new policy that contained a major loophole, according to FOIA experts. The directive, signed by Attorney General Eric Holder, instructed federal agencies to adopt a "presumption" of disclosure for FOIA requests. This reversal of Bush policy was intended to restore a standard set by President Clinton's attorney general, Janet Reno. But in a little-noticed passage, the Holder memo also said the new standard applies "if practicable" for cases involving "pending litigation." Dan Metcalfe, the former longtime chief of FOIA policy at Justice, says the passage and other "lawyerly hedges" means the Holder memo is now "astonishingly weaker" than the Reno policy.
Oh dear. "Lawyerly hedges" and "astonishingly weaker"? Them's fightin' words.
(The visitor-log request falls in this category because of a pending Bush-era lawsuit for such records.)

Administration officials say the Holder memo was drafted by senior Justice lawyers in consultation with Craig's office. The separate standard for "pending" lawsuits was inserted because of the "burden" it would impose on officials to go "backward" and reprocess hundreds of old cases, says Melanie Ann Pustay, who now heads the FOIA office. White House spokesman Ben LaBolt says Obama "has backed up his promise" with actions including the broadcast of White House meetings on the Web. (Others cite the release of the so-called torture memos.) As for the visitor logs, LaBolt says the policy is now "under review."
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#8  Er, ah maybe there are some "truth in advertising" issues; like the presidency doesn't live up to the campaign hype promises, eh what?
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-06-21 16:34  

#7  "For a president who said he was going to bring unprecedented transparency to government, you would certainly expect more than the recycling of old Bush secrecy policies reporter who should know better, you'd think I shouldn't be surprised."

There, Mr. Sobel. Fixed that for ya.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2009-06-21 10:46  

#6  Soon he will have the bunker mentality. He will want to control and direct everything from a safe and secure location. Yes I am early on this but I am a future thinker.
Posted by: Dale   2009-06-21 10:37  

#5  Transparency has outlive it's usefulness, I guess.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2009-06-21 10:21  

#4  Save your copy before it disappears down the Memory Hole(c). Rules are for little people.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-06-21 09:46  

#3  Hardly surprising. Simply another in a long list of undisclosed "logs" dating back to, can I safely say without retribution, August 4th 1961?
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-06-21 07:27  

#2  As always, cockroaches cannot stand a good strong light.
Posted by: no mo uro   2009-06-21 06:02  

#1  "Its not a crime when I do it" Richard Nixon Barack Obama
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-06-21 01:56  

00:00