You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Some would rather not dig up the Saudi past
2009-08-31
Much of the world knows Petra, the ancient ruin in modern-day Jordan that is celebrated in poetry as "the rose-red city, 'half as old as time,'" and which provided the climactic backdrop for "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade." But far fewer know Madain Saleh, a similarly spectacular treasure built by the same civilization, the Nabateans.

That's because it's in Saudi Arabia, where conservatives are deeply hostile to pagan, Jewish and Christian sites that predate the founding of Islam in the 7th century. But now, in a quiet but notable change of course, the kingdom has opened up an archaeology boom by allowing Saudi and foreign archaeologists to explore cities and trade routes long lost in the desert.

The sensitivities run deep. Archaeologists are cautioned not to talk about pre-Islamic finds outside scholarly literature. Few ancient treasures are on display, and no Christian or Jewish relics. A 4th or 5th century church in eastern Saudi Arabia has been fenced off ever since its accidental discovery 20 years ago and its exact whereabouts kept secret.
No doubt it can be found using GoogleMap's satellite function. There are real advantages to being a member of the culture that invented the tools now in common use.
Ah-ha! The 2,309,874th most holy place in all Christianity!
In the eyes of conservatives, the land where Islam was founded and the Prophet Muhammad was born must remain purely Muslim. Saudi Arabia bans public displays of crosses and churches, and whenever non-Islamic artifacts are excavated, the news must be kept low-key lest hard-liners destroy the finds.

"They should be left in the ground," said Sheikh Mohammed al-Nujaimi, a well-known cleric, reflecting the views of many religious leaders. "Any ruins belonging to non-Muslims should not be touched. Leave them in place, the way they have been for thousands of years." In an interview, he said Christians and Jews might claim discoveries of relics, and that Muslims would be angered if ancient symbols of other religions went on show. "How can crosses be displayed when Islam doesn't recognize that Christ was crucified?" said al-Nujaimi. "If we display them, it's as if we recognize the crucifixion."
True facts are such a downer, man...
In the past, Saudi authorities restricted foreign archaeologists to giving technical help to Saudi teams. Starting in 2000, they began a gradual process of easing up that culminated last year with American, European and Saudi teams launching significant excavations on sites that have long gone lightly explored, if at all. At the same time, authorities are gradually trying to acquaint the Saudi public with the idea of exploring the past, in part to eventually develop tourism. After years of being closed off, 2,000-year-old Madain Saleh is Saudi Arabia's first UNESCO World Heritage Site and is open to tourists. State media now occasionally mention discoveries as well as the kingdom's little known antiquities museums.
Posted by:ryuge

#5  Koran 4:157 And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain.
Posted by: ed   2009-08-31 21:00  

#4  I think perhaps there is a translation error. I always thought the Muslims believed Jesus was Crucified but he was not the Christ, not the son of God but just a prophet. Of course having never read the Quran so who knows.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2009-08-31 20:50  

#3  Crucifixion was the favored capital punishment of the era.

Thank goodness later empires went to more humane methods, like rope and a stout tree branch.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-08-31 20:31  

#2  Considering how many people were crucified by the Romans, how can the Saudis claim Christ wasn't?

Hell, the Romans crucified over 6,000 people at one time after the slave revolt lead by Spartacus.

Crucifixion was the favored capital punishment of the era.
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-08-31 19:07  

#1  Everything is politics. This also signals the decline of Wahabbi influence in the government. The Wahabbis hate and fear historical artifacts of all kinds, and have even systematically destroyed any physical traces of ancient Islam.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-08-31 11:09  

00:00