You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
SEC IG: Agency Never Did Competent Probe of Madoff
2009-09-03
The watchdog of the Securities and Exchange Commission has found that the agency consistently mishandled its investigations of Bernard Madoff's business, despite ample warnings of the multibillion-dollar fraud.

But SEC inspector general David Kotz's report found no evidence of any improper ties between agency officials and Madoff.

Despite speculation that senior SEC officials may have tried to influence the probes, a summary of Kotz's report released Wednesday also found no evidence of that.

The SEC enforcement staff, conducting investigations of Madoff's business, "almost immediately caught (him) in lies and misrepresentations, but failed to follow up on inconsistencies" and rejected whistleblowers' offers to provide additional evidence, the report says.

Revelations in December of the agency's failure to uncover Madoff's massive Ponzi scheme over a decade touched off one of the most painful scandals in the agency's 75-year history.

Between June 1992 and last December, when Madoff confessed, the SEC received six "substantive complaints that raised significant red flags" regarding Madoff's operations. But "a thorough and competent investigation or examination was never performed," the report says.

Many of the SEC staff who conducted the investigations were "inexperienced," according to the report.
Posted by:Fred

#2  or they may just have a lot of incompetent people

or they may have had people going to feel good seminars instead of doing their work
Posted by: lord garth   2009-09-03 14:59  

#1  Lessons Unlearned.

1 - the regulators charged with regulating failed to regulate. You don't need new rules or laws. You need new people.

2 - people allowed to be in persistent contact with those they're suppose to regulate tend to identify with those they're suppose to regulate particularly if the supervisees have more resources [$$$] than the supervisors. To twist a phrase - familiarity tends to breed corruption, in thought if not deed.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-09-03 07:26  

00:00