Submit your comments on this article | |
Britain | |
Scotland mulls over separation from UK | |
2009-09-05 | |
![]() Hoot, mon! 'Tis time to shuck the yoke of the sassenach!
"And if they doon't say what wee want 'em t' say, we'll ha' anoother referendumb!" In 1997, the Scots voted for Edinburgh's powers to be independent of the United Kingdom, paving the way for the 1999 reformation of the Scottish parliament. The parliament had been dissolved in 1707 following the Acts of Union, which joined Scotland and England together. Salmond called the so-called devolution a 'glass ceiling', which hampered the country's progress. "Aye, wee no kenna proogress havin' anything to do wi' the hated Brits!" It is, however, doubted that the move will survive the country's legislative minefield. Unionist parties are set to subject it to numerous challenges benefitting from their parliamentary majority over the SNP. Treasury chief Alistair Darling, meanwhile, called the Scottish prosperity conditioned on that of the UK and said Edinburgh had to see about the economy rather than addressing independence. Still thou are blest, compared wi' me! The present only toucheth thee: But och! I backward cast my e'e, On prospects drear! An' forward, tho' I canna see, I guess an' fear! | |
Posted by:Fred |
#12 If there was a referendum In England on separation from Scotchland, it would pass by miles. That and send the muslim jizya collectors home and Britain will be swimming in budget surpluses. At least until the politicians get wind of the surplus. |
Posted by: ed 2009-09-05 15:29 |
#11 What's the purpose? Petulance? |
Posted by: Bulldog 2009-09-05 15:21 |
#10 Like ETA and the others I don't get this. They are all part of the Super Bureaucratic EU state. That will not change with separation except both will have less clout within the EU. What's the purpose? |
Posted by: 3dc 2009-09-05 12:25 |
#9 Like Bonnie Prince Charlie and his group, things start out with a roar and end in retreat and disarray. Same will happen here. I enjoyed Scotland when I was there, even have some distant relatives still there, but like many many, it was time to leave. Got through the Glasgow airport without incident, so that was a plus. |
Posted by: Alaska Paul 2009-09-05 11:18 |
#8 The sooner they secede, the sooner they can get back to their old tradition of stabbing other clans in the back..... |
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie 2009-09-05 10:35 |
#7 Looks like the Scots aren't content w/their cut of the Lockerbie blood-for-oil transaction. |
Posted by: regular joe 2009-09-05 08:59 |
#6 Why don't Canadians get rid of Quebec? |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2009-09-05 08:44 |
#5 The Scots get more money from England than they contribute to the UK, just like the Quebecers and Canada. Or Robert Byrd leading a new secession movement. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2009-09-05 08:10 |
#4 Who cares what happens to them now? It seems all the good Scots have left Scotland ages ago. |
Posted by: whitecollar redneck 2009-09-05 08:03 |
#3 If there was a referendum In England on separation from Scotchland, it would pass by miles. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2009-09-05 07:10 |
#2 Moose: And the problem with that is? |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2009-09-05 01:13 |
#1 If they separate from England, the drop off of English tourists could halve the production of haggis. |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2009-09-05 01:04 |