You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Picking on ACORN
2009-09-27
There has been a lot of outrage over the videotapes that show workers for ACORN, the Assn. of Community Organizations for Reform Now, offering a couple posing as a prostitute and a pimp some advice on how to expand their "business" with government funding. Congress voted to cut off federal money to ACORN, and there are various probes into its funding and activities. This page chided the group for tarnishing the name of grass-roots organizers everywhere.

But that doesn't mean every gleeful anti-ACORN attack is on the mark. For example, the California Republican Party took the opportunity to call for a "full and complete forensic audit" of all voter registration cards solicited or submitted by ACORN or its representatives.

The state GOP should sit down and take a breath. There is an important distinction to be drawn between ACORN's voter registration efforts, which we commend, and its counseling services, which have some serious problems. The group was in the news last year because about a third of the voters it signed up turned out to be nonexistent, but don't forget the rest of the story: That 1-out-of-3 rate is on a par with all registration efforts for first-time voters -- and not necessarily through the fault of those doing the work.
How about when you sign up the Dallas Cowboys to vote in LA?
To be fair, I would not have recognized that one. On the other hand, I would have conscientiously checked their driver's licences or other form of identification before accepting their forms.
ACORN, in other words, is no better or worse than most others in registration, except in this: It signs up far more people, both the valid and, it stands to reason, the non-valid. By all means, there should be tighter controls to prevent fraudulent registrations, but there is no evidence to warrant a new voter registration probe.
Other than signing up the Dallas Cowboys ...
The state GOP this week announced a registration drive of its own, funded by gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman, complete with a $3 bounty on each valid signature.
Note, the bounty is only for valid signatures, not the Dallas Cowboys. A big difference that will lead to the canvassers checking quite thoroughly before they waste their time. See how simple it is?
A scandal in the making? No. Like it or not, it's not illegal to pay for new voters, whether they are Democrats or Republicans, and whether the signature gatherers are paid by an activist organization or the former head of EBay.
It is, I imagine, very illegal to pay for imaginary voters like the Dallas Cowboys. Let's look into what ACORN paid for, shall we? It will prove quite, quite amusing to those of us who are not subsequently living the monastic life all unchosen.
Slam ACORN for counseling pretend criminals. But if the group is also registering voters who don't tend to pick Republicans, well, sorry GOP, but that's not a crime.
What if they're signing up the Dallas Cowboys?
Posted by:Fred

#7  The list of states where ACORN ISN'T being investigated for voter fraud is a lot shorter than the opposite. Anyone "defending" ACORN is probably a crook, or at least friends with them.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-09-27 21:48  

#6  Why can't these people get off their butts and figure out how to do it themselves?

I think a lot of African Americans did, once they realized one of theirs had a chance. Sherri Shepherd is one example. 40 year old black woman (co-host of The View) registered for the first time in her life in order to vote for Obama (she had to ask her co-workers to assist her in this matter). She claims that her religious affiliation (Jehova's Witness) had prevented her in registering prior to 2008, although she had no such compulsions with it in "having more abortions than she could count". I doubt it's a stretch to assume she probably couldn't name the person currently serving as O's VP.
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007   2009-09-27 14:14  

#5  That 1-out-of-3 rate is on a par with all registration efforts for first-time voters -- and not necessarily through the fault of those doing the work.

OK...

1) I don't believe it.

2) It's no excuse even if it is true.

3) Why do we need groups like ACORN to help voters register anyway? Why can't these people get off their butts and figure out how to do it themselves? Is it, perhaps, because they are too stupid, ignorant and lazy? Is it because they are not legal residents of this country?

Thanks for finally waking up, GOP of California. It took you long enough.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2009-09-27 13:09  

#4  The system may be a tad flawed when you consider that about half of the 9/11 hijackers were actually able to register to vote in Virginia and Florida.
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007   2009-09-27 12:00  

#3  It's a lot harder for fictional voters to vote if they haven't registered. Defrauding only part of the electoral process is still a pretty damning crime in my eyes. When the voters no longer have confidence in the fairness of the outcomes of elections, we're on the verge of very serious problems. And I think we're getting close.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-09-27 09:15  

#2  There is an important distinction to be drawn between ACORN's voter registration efforts, which we commend,..

Sorta of ignores that the AG (D) of Nevada is engaged in a full blown investigation and prosecution of ACORN for voter registration fraud. Then again, this is the LAT.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-09-27 07:36  

#1  Actually, I don't care if they sign up imaginary voters. Registering to vote is not the same as actually voting. If those imaginary people actually try to vote, that's a problem.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-09-27 01:50  

00:00