You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Nork 'Struggles' an Apparent Failure
2009-10-08
North Korea launched a "150-day struggle," a press-ganged mobilization to increase production of collective farms from April 20 to Sept. 19 on the road to building a "powerful and prosperous nation" by 2012. No sooner had the one struggle ended than a "100-day struggle" ensued. But what exactly is the point?
More juche?
The 100-day struggle in the wake of the 150 struggle, despite propaganda that "great results were achieved," means that the North failed to achieve its goals. As the achievements, the regime cited increased electric power production and renovation of the Mt. Baekdu battlefield, a site idolizing former leader Kim Il-sung and present leader Kim Jong-il.

That alone, since it is quite unrelated to production, suggests that the first campaign failed. Hwang Jang-yop, a former secretary of the North Korean Workers' Party who defected to the South, said, "The activities taking place in the North in recent months are a kind of last gasp, using force to oppress the population and prolong the dictatorship."

The North has undergone major changes. With the ration system suspended in many regions since 2000, the market economy has made rapid inroads into North Korean society. North Korean defectors say the struggles are a means of keeping the market at bay by forcing people to work in the fields or on collective projects. They are also aimed, defectors say, at controlling a society shaken by UN sanctions and for the state to get its hands on individual wealth accumulated through the market.

A senior North Korean official who recently defected to the South said, "Though the 150-day struggle was supposed to raise economic strength to the level of the planned economy in the 1970s and '80s, its actual aim was eliminating the market economy." The North has never officially given up on the planned economy, but it effectively collapsed completely in the latter half of the 1990s. Some 80-90 percent of state-run enterprise staff are engaged in individual commerce, paying a certain amount of money to the businesses and keeping the rest for themselves.

Launching the 150-day struggle in April, the North tried to drive all able-bodied adults to collective farms. Beginning in spring, the security police rounded up anyone they found walking around in major cities and drove them to farms, reported the Daily NK.

The National Defense Committee proclaimed, "We must solve our food problem for ourselves and counter the unprecedented imperialist policy of isolating and smothering the nation" with UN sanctions. But the effort failed.

"Marauding and looting, sometimes even by hungry soldiers, are rampant in the North and giving rise to serious public unrest," one recent North Korean defector said. "It's all caused by the 150-day struggle. If North Koreans are driven further in the 100-day struggle until the end of the year, public unrest could get out of hand, and the results for the regime could be devastating."
Posted by:Steve White

#4  The western ruling class engineer recessions and North Korean ruling class engineer "struggles" to rob the people.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-10-08 13:30  

#3  But what exactly is the point?

Venting for the next round of Obama appointments? /rhet question
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-10-08 08:42  

#2  Compare wid WMF > SOUTH KOREAN POLL: 83% OF KOREANS WANT TO GO TO WAR AGZ CHINA; + BRITAIN: NEW SINO-JAPAN ALLIANCE ANOTHER SHOCK TO THE WORLD [JAPAN + "East Asian Community" concept].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-10-08 01:41  

#1  Couldn't the Norks combine all these little strugglettes into one big 5 Year Struggle? Worked for the Soviets and Chinese.
Posted by: ed   2009-10-08 00:28  

00:00