You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Times Metro Desk Cancels All Newspaper, Magazine Subscriptions
2009-10-13

The metro desk at the Times was informed today that all magazine and newspaper subscriptions have been canceled. If reporters want to check out the competition in the Post or the News, they can buy their own copies. The reason is obviously to save money, and the Times claims it can put the saved money toward freelancers.

Here's the memo sent to the metro staff by metro administrative manager Gloria Bell, (Take a look how quick-to-the-point this note is; these days, explanations for these sort of cuts are pretty unnecessary).
Folks,

You all know how tight budgets have become. They are getting tighter. Because of that we have decided to cut all subscriptions to newspapers and magazines that come in from the news dealer. If you wish to read any of the tabloids or out of town papers, either purchase your own or share with co-workers who purchase them to read on their way to work.

Please note, too, that any subscriptions you have regularly purchased and expensed may not be reimbursed anymore. Please check with me before you pay for anything. Most periodicals, including the tabloids and other daily newspapers, are available online through Ebsco masterfile which you can get to through the Research Dept's web page.

Sorry about this but the money we spent on these papers can be put to better use like paying freelancers. As always, thanks for your cooperation and understanding.
Later, a follow-up note was sent out, with the subject line, "Good Suggestion."
Please put any newspapers or magazines that you care to contribute to our "share and share alike" system, on the cabinet tops that used to house the Metro stacks. Thanks.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Go ahead cancel the subscriptions, you know these people can't read, they only look at the pictures.
Posted by: Maggie Slalet3910   2009-10-13 23:06  

#8  ...I believe that's been tried once. The results weren't good.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-10-13 20:32  

#7  Why don't they all just go online and read Rantburg?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2009-10-13 12:32  

#6  Interesting that they didn't suggest that the reporters get the information for free from their competitors' websites. Perhaps that was done verbally.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-10-13 11:02  

#5  If you get your instruction from the WH, why would you need to know what others are saying? /rhet question
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-10-13 10:04  

#4  Was it not just two weeks ago when the Times, red faced from the Van Jones event, said they needed to pay closer attention to what was being reported?

Maybe this is an attempt at culture change in the Times, get them on the computer and blogs.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2009-10-13 07:51  

#3  Agreed, Anguper Hupomosing9418. A better, if less succinct, headline might be, NYT no longer pays for outside subscriptions for employees I s'pose this will give their people the opportunity to explore the wonderful world of on-line reportage, even blogs. Can iPhones access the wonderful world of the internet from the subway?
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-10-13 06:21  

#2  If other newspapers follow suit then all of their subscriber bases will drop another 10%.
Posted by: DoDo   2009-10-13 01:25  

#1   The headline is a bit misleading. The Ebsco service has to cost a bit for a company like the NYT.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2009-10-13 00:13  

00:00