You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Rev. Al, Rush in riot row
2009-10-18
The Rev. Al Sharpton threatened to sue conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh for writing in a column that the civil rights leader played a role in two New York race riots.

In a column published by the Wall Street Journal today about his derailed bid to become part-owner of the St. Louis Rams, he accuses Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson of making comments that helped get him booted from a group that was trying to buy the NFL team.

Limbaugh derided Sharpton as having played "a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot" and the "1995 Freddie's Fashion Mart riot."

Those comments prompted a quick retort from Sharpton, who called both allegations false.

Sharpton was not present for or involved in the rioting in Brooklyn's Crown Heights section in August 1991, during which hundreds of blacks were involved in attacks on the neighborhood's Jewish residents. He did deliver a eulogy at the funeral of the youth whose death in a traffic accident triggered the violence, but that didn't happen until the violence ended.

Sharpton also wasn't present on Dec. 8, 1995, when a lone, black gunman burst into Freddie's Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem, started shooting and set the building on fire. Seven people died. There was no riot.

Sharpton's organization had, like other black groups, been involved in picketing the business over its plans to expand into space occupied by a black-owned business, but he said he couldn't be blamed for the madman's rampage.

"Unless Mr. Limbaugh apologizes and clarifies his statements, attorneys for Rev. Sharpton will move forward with a lawsuit," said a written statement released today by Sharpton's spokeswoman. "He has the right to criticize Rev. Sharpton, but he does not have the right to accuse him of criminal activity, and riots and murders are criminal."
Posted by:Fred

#7  ...but he does not have the right to accuse him of criminal activity.

The kettle is black...oh, can I say that?...maybe not, How about...gee, that's hypocrisy?
Posted by: Jack Salami   2009-10-18 11:50  

#6  Al Sharpton is nothing more than a race baiting hustler.
Posted by: WolfDog   2009-10-18 11:04  

#5  he also didn't accuse the Duke Lacrosse team members of rape the night the "incident" happened. A couple days later, tho.....
Posted by: Frank G   2009-10-18 08:13  

#4  Reverend Al was not "involved" in the Tawana Brawley hoax. At least not until he inserted himself into it and turned it into a media circus.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-10-18 01:04  

#3  I wonder what the CNN archives might have to say about the Rev Al?
Posted by: tipover   2009-10-18 01:02  

#2  Caught that, did you? The Rev hardly has to lift a finger to defend himself, he's got so many reporters willing to do it for him.
Posted by: Steve White   2009-10-18 00:56  

#1  Sharpton was not present for or involved in the rioting in Brooklyn's Crown Heights section in August 1991, during which hundreds of blacks were involved in attacks on the neighborhood's Jewish residents. He did deliver a eulogy at the funeral of the youth whose death in a traffic accident triggered the violence, but that didn't happen until the violence ended.

And --

Sharpton also wasn't present on Dec. 8, 1995, when a lone, black gunman burst into Freddie's Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem, started shooting and set the building on fire. Seven people died. There was no riot.

Thus spoke this reporter aka Journalist, leading one to believe, Rush is lying...... mmmmm, mmmmm mmmmmm
Posted by: Sherry   2009-10-18 00:44  

00:00