You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Times Says It Will Cut 100 Newsroom Jobs
2009-10-20

The New York Times plans to eliminate 100 newsroom jobs -- about 8 percent of the total -- by year's end, offering buyouts to union and non-union employees, and resorting to layoffs if it cannot get enough people to leave voluntarily, the paper announced on Monday.

Fred R. Conrad/The New York TimesThe program mirrors one carried out in the spring of 2008, when the paper erased 100 positions in its newsroom, though other jobs were created, so the net reduction was smaller. That round of cuts included some layoffs of journalists -- about 15 to 20, though The Times would not disclose the actual figure -- which was the first time in memory that had happened.

The paper has made much deeper reductions in other, non-newsroom departments, where layoffs have occurred several times. But the advertising drop that has pummeled the industry has forced cuts in the news operation as well. The newsroom already has lowered its budgets for freelancers and trimmed other expenses, and employees took a 5 percent pay cut for most of this year.
Posted by:Fred

#11  Hey, they are just doing the same thing that Time and Newsweek have done, and you can see how successful those mags are.

(They are such a friggin joke...both are reed-thin and have about 4 advertisers.)
Posted by: Remoteman   2009-10-20 22:18  

#10  they have positioned themselves ideally to appeal to a large portion of the liberal market

Not even that - try a section of Manhattan.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-10-20 21:18  

#9  Rupert wouldn't want to diminish News Corps's credibility as a news organization
Posted by: Frank G   2009-10-20 18:25  

#8  Now there best bet is to be bought by Fox News.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2009-10-20 18:19  

#7  The reputation is tarnished now so returning to actual Neutral Reporting may not save them. Still, if they'd done so right after Sept 11 they might have had a better outlook now.

Make your editorial section as liberal as you want but keep the news politics free. It's not that difficult, yet they simply couldn't manage. They deserve to die.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2009-10-20 18:18  

#6  gorb, back when the New York Times was universally accepted as the newspaper of record, half their readers were conservatives. Now the conservatives have taken themselves elsewhere.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-10-20 16:39  

#5  All kidding aside, is there anything the NYT could do to save itself? Seems to me they have positioned themselves ideally to appeal to a large portion of the liberal market, but aren't making any headway. I'm guessing liberals are either moving to the right, or getting their news elsewhere. Or both.
Posted by: gorb   2009-10-20 15:58  

#4  The fact checking staff hasn't been used in ages anyway.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2009-10-20 13:50  

#3  Given the WH 'owns' the media, all they have to do is email it in and have someone format it for the next day. Took a 100 to do that? Must be a union shop. Oh, wait, never mind.
Posted by: Procopius2k    2009-10-20 08:03  

#2  It took more than 1000 newsroom people to call the whitehouse and DNC to find out what to report?

I believe they could cut much deeper with no impact to content or quality.

A good side business would be to move furniture from NY to DC where these folks will find new employment.
Posted by: airandee   2009-10-20 07:35  

#1  With any luck, in 2020 the last NYT propagandist gets laid off.
Posted by: ed   2009-10-20 01:03  

00:00