You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Anti-incumbent wave pounds city halls
2009-10-26
A series of upsets and close calls in big-city elections is producing the first group of politicians to fall victim to voters' economic frustrations: America's mayors.

While political observers are focused on the outcome of the Nov. 3 gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey for early insights into the 2010 midterms, it's in City Hall where the most ominous trend is emerging.

Some incumbent mayors have already lost their races. Others have held on to win--or are likely to win next week--with greatly diminished margins from their previous re-election bids. Either way, local incumbents are bleeding badly after being buffeted by the pressures of high unemployment, low tax revenues and a volatile, impatient electorate.
What percentage of embattled mayors are Democrats versus Republicans vs. Other?
Can't tell from the article, can you ...
Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, a second-term incumbent and president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, was defeated for re-election in an August primary by two candidates with thin political resumes. On October 6, Albuquerque Mayor Martin Chavez fell short in his bid for a third consecutive term, putting the city's top office in Republican hands for the first time in a quarter-century.

Even for mayors who have survived re-election campaigns, the results haven't been pretty. Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who beat an incumbent by 18 points to win the seat in 2005, won a second term earlier this year with just 56 percent of the vote despite facing no significant opposition.

In two more elections coming up next month, high-profile mayors are expected to prevail, though by considerably smaller margins than they've been accustomed to winning. Boston's Tom Menino, who barely cracked 50 percent in a September primary election, is drawing support from just 52 percent of likely voters in his bid for a fifth term. New York City's Michael Bloomberg, too, attracted just 52 percent of votes in a recent poll.

In 2005, Menino won by a 35-point landslide while Bloomberg won by close to 20 points.

"People are lashing out, have less patience with the elected officials closest to them," said Louisville Mayor Jerry Abramson, the longest-serving mayor in city history and a former president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors. "That kind of angst materializes either in walking away from the system or in deciding that whoever is up for election must have played some role, somehow, in some way, in the international financial crisis."

Abramson, who is running for lieutenant governor of Kentucky in 2011, doesn't have to face the voters this year. But for other mayors, the national environment represents a more immediate threat.
Posted by:Fred

#6  The Republicans could throw a monkey wrench into Obama's base by suggesting that the federal government should impose a non-partisan "charter government" on Chicago. The Daley machine would freak out.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-10-26 16:52  

#5  In some cities the mayor has practically no power so it doesn't matter what party he is. The power in many cities is in the city council. Those are the most interesting races to me.

Posted by: crosspatch   2009-10-26 15:08  

#4  On October 6, Albuquerque Mayor Martin Chavez fell short in his bid for a third consecutive term, putting the city's top office in Republican hands for the first time in a quarter-century.

Given the Peter Principle, Marty was a competent mayor. Not perfect and with tendencies to expand the city bureaucracy and push small things that just ratcheted up the annoyance factors. However, the city charter said two consecutive terms. He judge shopped to find someone, outside the city, to kill that provision. That upset a lot of people who'd otherwise have voted for him if he took a term off and then returned to run again. Instead he alienated too many with that little game.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-10-26 07:55  

#3  Fact is most urban areas are Democrat blue and are unlikely to replace the Democrat with a Republican. So the replacements are coming from other liberals, either other Democrats or Greens or something.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2009-10-26 07:48  

#2  Term limits would help.
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-10-26 05:56  

#1  Hey, if it were me, I'd have them all replaced. Getting institutionalized is really destructive for elected officials.
Posted by: gromky   2009-10-26 00:25  

00:00