You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Give up meat to save the planet
2009-10-27
In an interview with The Times, Lord Stern of Brentford said: "Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world's resources. A vegetarian diet is better."
Yaas, yaas. You are vegetarian, I presume?
"I am 61 now and attitudes towards drinking and driving have changed radically since I was a student."
Gives you a dreadful hangover these days, right? Ah, lost youth. But duty and right thinking beckon, I'm sure.
"People change their notion of what is responsible. They will increasingly ask about the carbon content of their food."
Is it charred on the outside and cool pink in the center?
Lord Stern, a former chief economist of the World Bank and now I. G. Patel Professor of Economics at the London School of Economics, warned that British taxpayers would need to contribute about £3 billion a year by 2015 to help poor countries to cope with the inevitable impact of climate change.
Patel, Patel. Sounds Indian. That would be one of the countries under consideration, no?
Up to 20,000 delegates from 192 countries are due to attend the UN conference in the Danish capital. Its aim is to forge a deal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions sufficiently to prevent an increase in global temperatures of more than 2 degrees centigrade.
20,000! I assume no meat is being served. Har Har. Talk about your carbon footprint. I suppose they'll complain about everything except the food, wine, accomodations, and conference air transport.
Haven't all these delegates heard about video conferencing ...
Posted by:KBK

#22  Sigh. We are a carbon based life form living in a carbon based world. We consume carbohydrates to survive. We exhale carbon dioxide with every breath.

We would do just as much by outlawing all non essential physical activity. Walking, running, all sports, football, peace matches, protests, exercise of all kinds. Get rid of all non contributing life forms, pets, fluffy bunnies, CNN anchors, politicians.
Posted by: Skunky Glins****   2009-10-27 22:36  

#21  The numbers at prove it have been completely reset recently

Yup, and the early returns on the reset were showing ten to one against. I guess the staff didn't like that, either, because now it's back to 5441 for, 6756 against again, and increasing slowly. I'd love to have a time series of this data.

These people have no shame - the poll webpages are totally tendentious.
Posted by: KBK   2009-10-27 21:56  

#20  HOMER SIMPSON > MMMMMMMMM, SOLYE-N-T-T-T GREEN [Orange, Purple, red, etc vee FUTURAMA].

[HOMER'S SERIOUS SALIVATINGS here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-10-27 20:45  

#19  I thought edible pets was an OK idea. Problem is no one would eat their own pet.
Posted by: phil_b   2009-10-27 20:16  

#18  PETA

People
Eating
Tasty
Animals

Steak (Pink center)
Fried Chicken (Cruncht crust)
Tuna Sandwiches (On Brown Bread)
Shrimp (Golden and crunchy)
Veal (With white gravy)
BBQ Ribs (Finger lickin good)
Pork Roast (Ummm thick slices with Mustard)
Ham (Repeat)
Thanksgiving Turkey (With all the trimmings)
Chicken Livers (Crunchy and soft centered)

Yall continue without me,
suddenly I'm hungry.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-10-27 13:58  

#17  Tell everyone to register again, as like the EU they didn't like the first answer.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-10-27 13:39  

#16  The numbers at prove it have been completely reset recently.

Can't even fiddle a hockey stick.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-10-27 13:31  

#15  BTW, the "recommended" comments on the original article are running entirely against Lord Stern's policy (to say the least).
Posted by: KBK   2009-10-27 13:30  

#14  Remember that Science Museum "Count Me In" poll?

Back at the Science Museum ’s opinion poll referred to above, correspondents have noted strange goings on. On Friday The Englishman noted that voting was about four to one against. Derek Reynolds in correspondence noted that by Sunday morning it was approaching six to one against, which corresponds to your bending author’s recollection. Quite suddenly the votes have become almost even. Far be it for us to suggest that there is anything of an ichthyoid malodour about this, or that it is in any way comparable to any recent election in an Islamic republic, but Sunday night is a very unusual time for such intense activity on the internet. If such movement occurred in a publicly quoted share price the regulatory authorities would be sniffing around in no uncertain manner.

Shenanigans?

I noted this myself.

"Hey, it's data! You know what to do with that."
Posted by: KBK   2009-10-27 13:07  

#13  Do one better and leave the lawnmower running!
Posted by: gorb   2009-10-27 10:59  

#12  Article made me want to drive across town to our favorite meat market. Of course, I'll leave the engine in the SUV running while I go in and place my order.
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007   2009-10-27 10:17  

#11  It's all about the hookers, Doc. I hear they're reimbursable under UN rules.

That's why they had to travel. Here the FBI was rounding up all their pimps suppliers and stock [scroll below for article on details].
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-10-27 09:36  

#10  Can we give up politicians and bureaucrats instead? They release more hot air and bullshit than any other thing on the planet.
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-10-27 09:25  

#9  Haven't all these delegates heard about video conferencing ...
It's all about the hookers, Doc. I hear they're reimbursable under UN rules.
Posted by: Spot   2009-10-27 08:20  

#8  "Haven't all these delegates heard about video conferencing ..."

Oh come now... the only point to being a delegate to an international conference is to travel internationally.
Posted by: eLarson   2009-10-27 08:19  

#7  Ah, you are too kind, ed. If he really wanted to reduce carbon dioxide, he'd stop breathing.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-10-27 07:57  

#6  Poseur! If the good Lord Stern really wanted to reduce man made CO2, he'd become a cannibal. Not that I want to give the post religious English any ideas.
Posted by: ed   2009-10-27 07:16  

#5  There is a place for all of God's creatures on this green earth, it is on my plate right next to the GRAVY.
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2009-10-27 06:12  

#4  Too bad his highness' dad haven't given up women as a teenager.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-27 03:40  

#3  The only way anyone will ever get me to let go of my meat will be to pry it from my cold, dead, . . . hands. Nevermind.
Posted by: gorb   2009-10-27 01:46  

#2  I demand my BBQ Ribs: BRyants BBQ & Ollie Gates BBQ - both in KC and best in the world!

BBQBorgboy
Posted by: borgboy   2009-10-27 01:40  

#1  "Ask about the carbon content of their food" > YEP, YOU BETCHA, JUST LIKE MOM + GRANDMA,
ETC. NEVER DID.

Jeebus, it was FISH = TUNA STOCKS last month, + MCDONALD's this AM. The afternnoon is still young.

Pray tell, I'll bite, what does the OWG-NWO desire Amer Moms + Parents to teach their kidz other than

* CHICKEN SOUP IS GOOD FOR COLDS + FLU.
* LIVER IS GOOD FOR YOUR BLOOD.
* TURKEY + HAM IS GOOD FOR THE HOLIDAY SEASON. + LEFTOVERS.
* BEEF, FISH PROTEIN = MEATS WILL MAKE YOU STRONG.

et al.

So that we the [then]Kidz of America = Amerika can all grow up to be DOCTORS, LAWYERS, ASTRONAUTS, + POTUS OF THESE UNITED STATES.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-10-27 00:36  

00:00