You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
WH Visitor Records
2009-10-31
Click the link to see the list. There have to be dozens and dozens of names there. :-/ Nothing like full disclosure, is there!

Now why would the Noobama administration be crowing about this penny-ante crap? Each and every name on this list basically had to be extracted if I read this right. It seems like a smoke screen. They have bigger stuff they could be disclosing for sure. Like what they talked about during lobbying sessions, the contents of the health bill, why they haven't bombed the government of Iran into nonexistance, their math on the benefits of the stimulus package, etc.. They're playing everyone for chumps and need to be spanked.

I don't care what they discuss during meetings. People say lots of things in meetings, most of which don't matter. I do want to know what was decided, what legislation is being proposed... that kind of thing. If someone mutters to the guy next to him that he'd hit that, I just don't need to know. Actually, I'm not sure why I should care who visited the White House, either. Are the phone logs going to be demanded next? Emails?
Visitor logs, phone logs and e-mail are all public records. If they're public then the public has the right to inspect them. 99% of them might be boring and tedious. I want to see the other 1%.
Transparency like you couldn't care less about you've never seen before

Today marks a major milestone in government transparency -- and an important lesson in the unintended consequences of such vigorous disclosure.

We previously announced that the White House in December of this year would -- for the first time in history -- begin posting all White House visitor records under the terms of our new voluntary disclosure policy. As part of that initiative, we also offered to look back at the records created before the announcement of the policy and answer specific requests for visitor records created earlier in the year.

So far we've processed 110 disclosure requests from September that yielded nearly 500 visitor records. All of these are now available on the White House website in accessible, searchable format for anyone to browse or download. Consistent with our earlier announcement that we will only release records 90 days or older, this first batch covers the period of time between January 20, 2009 to July 31, 2009. Future batches will be posted on an ongoing basis. (You can submit a request here.)

This first release is only the latest in a series of unprecedented steps by the President to increase openness in government. They include putting up more government information than ever before on data.gov and recovery.gov, reforming the government's FOIA processes, providing on-line access to White House staff financial reports and salaries, adopting a tough new state secrets policy, reversing an executive order that previously limited access to presidential records, and web-casting White House meetings and conferences. The release also compliments our new lobbying rules, which in addition to closing the revolving door for lobbyists who work in government have also emphasized expanding disclosure of lobbyist contacts with the government.
Oh no! There's going to be a big hit to the employment figures when all the lobbyists hit the streets if this is true!
There's an important lesson here as well. This unprecedented level of transparency can sometimes be confusing rather than providing clear information.

A lot of people visit the White House, up to 100,000 each month, with many of those folks coming to tour the buildings. Given this large amount of data, the records we are publishing today include a few "false positives" -- names that make you think of a well-known person, but are actually someone else. In September, requests were submitted for the names of some famous or controversial figures (for example Michael Jordan, William Ayers, Michael Moore, Jeremiah Wright, Robert Kelly ("R. Kelly"), and Malik Shabazz). The well-known individuals with those names never actually came to the White House. Nevertheless, we were asked for those names and so we have included records for those individuals who were here and share the same names.
I saw Billy Carter has come back from the grave for a visit. Somebody see if Elvis visited Obama to congratulate him.
Posted by:gorb

#6  Besoeker, France also grants refuge to US pedophile/rapists - see Polanski, Roman. And murderers - see Einhorn, Ira.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-10-31 18:33  

#5  Unfortunately Wooz, convicted felons and pedifilic rapist fugitives from French courts find easy refuge here. We seem to embrace them.
Posted by: Besoeker    2009-10-31 18:19  

#4  WH says it's a 'different' William Ayers, Michael Moore, Jeremiah Wright and Michael Jordan.

George Soros, however, is a convicted felon in France. Nice to see Barry hasn't improved his caliber of friends. But then, why would he? They got him where he is today.
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007   2009-10-31 18:00  

#3  the WH says it was "a different Bill Ayers". This one didn't write Zero's autobiography
Posted by: Frank G   2009-10-31 11:55  

#2  The list I saw on Drudge had Bill Ayers and Angela Davis on it.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2009-10-31 10:39  

#1  One reason to care about who visits the White House and what was discussed.
“As far as I can tell, THE Andrew Stern was the top outside visitor to the White House with approximately 20 visits, or about three visits per month, including four relatively small meetings with the president and a dozen with other White House staffers. Stern has openly bragged about the SEIU’s $61 million investment in Barack Obama. It certainly bought him a lot of access.”
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2009-10-31 10:21  

00:00