You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Obama's Afghan decision not likely before Nov. 11
2009-11-01
U.S. President Barack Obama is unlikely to make a decision on his Afghanistan strategy and sending thousands more troops there before he embarks on his trip to Asia on Nov. 11, a senior administration official said on Saturday. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, stressed that while a decision was unlikely before then, it had not been ruled out.
Who would have thought that Bambi would be waiting on the governor's race in Joisey before making a decision on Afghanistan?
It is unclear if Obama would wait until he returned from his Nov. 11 -20 trip to unveil his decision or announce it while he was traveling in the region.
So it could be even later ...
The timing of Obama's announcement would not be influenced by outside factors, the official said, referring to the political upheaval in Afghanistan after a disputed presidential election in August. A run-off is scheduled for Nov. 7.
But the races in Joisey and NY-23 aren't outside factors ...
Obama has faced criticism from Republican opponents, including former Vice President Dick Cheney, over his lengthy review of the strategy he put in place in March. Critics say he is being over-cautious and the delay in making an announcement on the way forward in Afghanistan is emboldening the Taliban.
As Fred would say, the choice is simple: defecate or decommode ...
Not an awful lot of carefully graduated nuance between [poop] and [get off pot] is there?
I'm sure you've seen the line of intersection of dog and carpet...
The White House says Obama will not be stampeded into making a hasty decision. It accuses the former Bush administration of neglecting the eight-year-old war and allowing the security situation there to deteriorate.
Blaming Bush isn't going to work. Everyone recognizes the success Bush had at first. Everyone recognizes that NATO didn't help pull its expected weight. Bush can be blamed for not putting more troops in but he was busy at the time. It's now been 10 months since Bambi took office. As surely as Johnson's war became Nixon war, Bush's war becomes Bambi's war.
Obama held talks with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the leaders of each branch of the U.S. military, at the White House on Friday. He is expected to hold a further meeting with his security team next week. So far, he has held eight meetings.

The Pentagon is looking at the resources it would need to fulfill the strategic options being considered, the administration official said. But Obama had not asked the Joint Chiefs to come back to him with specific troop numbers.

General Stanley McChrystal, the commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, has recommended deploying an additional 40,000 troops next year, a figure that includes trainers to accelerate the expansion of the Afghan army.

Another and potentially more politically palatable option under consideration by the administration would add about 10,000 to 15,000 troops, a large portion of whom would be focused on increasing the training of Afghan forces, a top priority for Obama's Democratic allies in Congress.

Officials say Obama may opt for a number in between.
Of course: he's a difference splitter. That's what you do as a 'community organizer', state senator and US senator. You find differences and split them. Bush was an oilman and a governor. He made decisions.
There are about 67,000 U.S. troops and 42,000 allied forces in Afghanistan.
Posted by:Steve White

#20  For the Prez:
Posted by: 3dc   2009-11-01 22:42  

#19  The answer is simple. He's waiting for the Dreaded Afghan Winter.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-11-01 20:43  

#18  Veteran's Day. How appropriate.

Well, he did do something memorable for Poland on the day they got invaded by the Soviet Union....
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-11-01 20:19  

#17  Good to know, P2k, but I don't think it will be necessary. Kaine has refused to interfere with lesser murderers than Johnny-boy meeting their new roommates in HELL.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-11-01 16:00  

#16  Not that Kaine wouldn't like to commute his sentence - Kaine's against the death penalty - but he's not that politically stupid.

IIRC Alabama has a hold on the dude for murder as well. If VA doesn't go through with it, they'll request extradition and stick him with a new date to meet his maker. We're just talking a delay here.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-11-01 15:19  

#15  Barbara Boxer apparently holds meetings on the streets of Oakland, according to her companions, who didnÂ’t want to allow a constituent with a camera to question Senator MaÂ’am on policy in Afghanistan. Boxer finally responds long enough to insist that Congress will not allow more troops to go into Afghanistan, which then prompts the question of whether we should keep troops there at all if weÂ’re not going to fight to win there. Boxer walks away, even though the constituent calls her “Senator” Â… repeatedly:
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2009-11-01 14:30  

#14  we already know how Eric Holder would go on that

*spit*
Posted by: Frank G   2009-11-01 14:07  

#13  "Gorb, John Allen Muhammed is not under the jurisdiction of the President; only the Governor of Virginia could pardon him. And if you think that's going to happen...."

Eric's right.

Not that Kaine wouldn't like to commute his sentence - Kaine's against the death penalty - but he's not that politically stupid.

Although I wouldn't put it past Bambi to try to get involved if his handlers he thought it would help him to establish a dictatorship in the U.S. politically somehow.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-11-01 13:52  

#12  Veteran's Day. How appropriate.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2009-11-01 13:31  

#11  Now tell me.....how long did Bush have to decide to INVADE after 9/11? Less time than Zero has been diddling over this I'd wager.
Posted by: AlanC   2009-11-01 13:20  

#10  I bet he delays the decision till Feb. 2013.

That way he'll be able to say: "I made a decision, but wasn't able to implement it because of those damned Republicans!"


Posted by: Frozen Al   2009-11-01 13:18  

#9  He obviously considers this Above His Pay Grade.....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-11-01 11:35  

#8  Gorb, John Allen Muhammed is not under the jurisdiction of the President; only the Governor of Virginia could pardon him. And if you think that's going to happen....
Posted by: Eric Jablow   2009-11-01 11:15  

#7  "everyone knows jet lag scrambles the decision-making capacity"

That assumes Bambi has any decision-making capacity, tw.

He don't. He's waiting for Soros Ayers his handlers advisors to tell him what to do.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-11-01 10:57  

#6  "present!"
Posted by: Frank G   2009-11-01 10:48  

#5  The man will be travelling around the world, after all. It's not fair to expect him to make momentous decisions as well -- everyone knows jet lag scrambles the decision-making capacity. Even if making decisions is the job description.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-11-01 10:45  

#4  Obama's Afghan decision not likely before Nov. 11

Give him a break. He's gotta decide whether he should pardon John Allen Muhammad before he's put to a well-deserved death on November 10th.
Posted by: gorb   2009-11-01 03:36  

#3  He desperately wants to blame Bush for this fiasco, problem is he can't, Best alternative is stall.

I recently read a comment that while really is not aimed at Obama fits perfectly.

(Question) Out of his depth, isn't he?
(Answer) Like a pogo stick in the ocean.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-11-01 02:56  

#2  Depends entirely on the makeup of the next Congress, pro dem? he'll decide NO.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-11-01 02:45  

#1  How likely a decision after Nov 11?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-11-01 01:33  

00:00