You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Republicans rally as Virginians turn against Obama
2009-11-01
Nancy Breeden was not sucked in by the euphoria that swept Barack Obama to power and landed him the first victory by a Democratic presidential contender in Virginia in more than four decades.

"I was going to vote for John McCain but it terrified me that if anything happened to him we would have this totally ignorant woman as president. So I voted for Obama as the lesser of two evils," said the 77-year-old, as she half-watched the news on a television larger than almost anything else in her living room.

"It's turned out exactly as I expected. The man has absolutely no experience. I'm disillusioned with him about everything. His healthcare plan is a disaster. He doesn't know how to deal with the rest of the world."

Breeden is voting Republican in next week's election for governor of Virginia. Opinion polls suggest voters will resoundingly reject Obama's candidate in favour of a man who once blasted working women and feminism as the biggest threat to the family, opposed contraception for unmarried couples, and questioned the constitutional separation of church and state.

The Republicans are portraying the Virginia governor's race as a referendum on Obama after nine months in power, and the Democrats' looming loss of the governorship as evidence of deepening disillusionment with the president.

The Democrats, sensing a significant defeat, are shifting responsibility for that on to the cyclical nature of Virginia politics and a poor candidate who failed to make sufficient use of the party's greatest asset -- Obama.

In reality, the result will reflect the divide over the role of government and the uniqueness of Obama's election. Democratic campaign managers acknowledge that it is almost impossible to inject the same energy that gripped the presidential race, with its ­ unprecedented turnout.

But the Virginia contest has also seen a re-energised Republican party emerge which, despite a lack of focused leadership and a coherent national platform, has tapped in to a resurgent anger among many conservative voters.

"It's a good feeling to have the wind at our backs," said Corry Bliss, a Republican campaign manager in Virginia. "Being a Republican was tough when we had the Bush factor. Now there's a bit of buyer's remorse [over Obama]. I think he is still personally popular, but his policies are unpopular. People are worried about the economy. People are asking: 'What does healthcare reform mean for me?' "

Obama pulled off a 7% swing to the Democrats in Virginia in last year's election, the first time the party has taken the state in a presidential race since 1964. He did particularly well in the north of the state, which is largely a commuter suburb of Washington. However, he did poorly among white males in the rest of Virginia, where conservative views on government, guns and abortion prevail.

Among the districts to flip over to Obama was Prince William County, which sits on the dividing line between the old Virginia and the growing liberal colony in the north. George Bush won the county in both his election victories. Last year, Obama took the county seat, Manassas, with 57% of the vote. Breeden's was one of them.
Posted by:Fred

#22  Don't make it sound so attractive Pappy.
Posted by: 3dc   2009-11-01 22:52  

#21  Do you want to run her off in the name of pearl shinery that we may remain pure or would you like to have her vote for the candidate of your choice? Think hard, there's going to be an exam in 12 months.

Don't think anyone mentioned running her off. Just that her reasons for voting in the last Presidential election were... less than well thought out.

But we'd have to remove half the eligible population from the voting rolls for that reason.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-11-01 21:22  

#20  #10 To Nc Mike
Hi JFM!
I'm aware that was a fascist theory (I'm pretty sure it was Hitler) and I personally don't subscribe to it for the reasons you mention, aside from the fact that we aren't subject to mob rule in the US (yet). I didn't intend to give the impression that I do.
However, reading Nancy's comments in the original article made me think it was a fitting description of the sort of flawed logic that uniformed voters bring to the booth. Knuckleheads like her are the reason for our present mess.
Posted by: NCMike   2009-11-01 17:22  

#19  Do you want to run her off in the name of pearl shinery that we may remain pure or would you like to have her vote for the candidate of your choice?

I vote to keep her for now, but that doesn't mean she's not a dumbass. The dumbass.
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007   2009-11-01 15:48  

#18  McDonnel looks like he is going to take Virginia. New Jersey looks too close to call. Hard to say what NY 23 is going to do at this time. It is very close between Hoffman and Owens. I hope Hoffman, Christie, and McDonnell make a clean sweep and send a strong message to both Democrats and Republicans that voters think things are really getting screwed up.
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-11-01 15:46  

#17  I have to agree with .5MT, who can be very sensible when he wants. Although I must ask, what on earth is pearl shinery?
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-11-01 15:16  

#16  Breeden is voting Republican in next week's election for governor of Virginia.
Let's try it again.

Do you want to run her off in the name of pearl shinery that we may remain pure or would you like to have her vote for the candidate of your choice? Think hard, there's going to be an exam in 12 months.

This is not too damn difficult, hold your collective ideological breaths and let the voters vote for you without kicking them before they enter the polls.
Posted by: .5mt   2009-11-01 13:36  

#15  With all due respect, voting for a third party candidate makes a statement with poll numbers, but in the end it is a party splitter and as such, a vote AGAINST the Republicans. Count the number of third party candidates who have actually won in various elections and then gauge the value of a third party vote.
Posted by: Besoeker    2009-11-01 12:50  

#14  People who can't see the difference between Democrats and Republicans shoudn't vote.

Parabellum, there are many times I can't see the difference between them, so I either vote third party or Republican - is that ok?
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-11-01 12:42  

#13  #9 "I was going to vote for John McCain but it terrified me that if anything happened to him we would have this totally ignorant woman as president."

Nancy Breeden identifies "ignorant woman" and elderly white male candidate and votes for communist instead. Ok, I get it.
Posted by Besoeker


It was just Freudian projection on her part.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-11-01 11:04  

#12  The sad thing is that Nancy the Ignorant still didn't get the hint - basically that she is being lied to by the media.

The next election when the media crowns someone president (I'm thinking a woman or gay person - based only on their 'ethnic' identity) and fires up the hype machine she will still be there with open ears and empty mind.

Rinse, Repeat....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-11-01 10:07  

#11  because Plugz Biden is sooooo smart. Just ask him
Posted by: Frank G   2009-11-01 09:51  

#10  To Nc Mike

About the (fascist) theory that democracy is two idiots counting more than a wise guy problme is: who is determining who is the wise guy? Do you think for instance that those journalists of CNN are wise guys. I also remind you that because the majority is not everytime wise or virtuous, Aherica is not a democracy but a Republic.

In one thing however I thin we could agree: efforts to bring out the vote should be bannned: not only because some of the orgabnizations who do it are not neutral but because it leads people who are not interested in politics and have in vested zero time on knowing what is all about to vote like those gazillions of Obama v voters who thought the Republican party controlled the Congress.
Posted by: JFM   2009-11-01 09:44  

#9  "I was going to vote for John McCain but it terrified me that if anything happened to him we would have this totally ignorant woman as president.

Nancy Breeden identifies "ignorant woman" and elderly white male candidate and votes for communist instead. Ok, I get it.
Posted by: Besoeker    2009-11-01 09:13  

#8  
People who can't see the difference between Democrats and Republicans shoudn't vote. It's just those ignorant morons who gave us 'president 0bama'.

Spit.
Posted by: Parabellum   2009-11-01 08:38  

#7  Breeden is voting Republican in next week's election for governor of Virginia.

We don't want her kind. Better she should stay home.

Posted by: .5mt   2009-11-01 08:12  

#6  Among the districts to flip over to Obama was Prince William County, which sits on the dividing line between the old Virginia and the pigs feeding from the taxpayers' teat growing liberal colony in the north.
Posted by: ed   2009-11-01 07:21  

#5  Nancy is the poster prune child for voter testing at the same age mandatory driver's license testing kicks in. I suggest lots of logical reasoning questions.
Posted by: ed   2009-11-01 07:17  

#4  Get used to the idea that the Dems are always they are smarter than everyone else. Peggy the Moocher is proof.
Posted by: SR-71   2009-11-01 07:03  

#3  The old criticism of democracy being a system where the votes of two idiots count for more than that of one wise man goes a long way in explaining Obama's election and dimwitted Nancy's part in it.
Posted by: NCMike   2009-11-01 06:59  

#2  Ol' Nancy needs her meds adjusted, and if someone could distract the old bat with something shiny on Election Day, that would be appreciated. Eeesh.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-11-01 01:58  

#1  "I was going to vote for John McCain but it terrified me that if anything happened to him we would have this totally ignorant woman as president."

So you voted for a clown with NO executive experience whatsoever, who never worked an honest job in his life, instead of voting for a woman who has run a business and has executive experience, including running AN ENTIRE STATE.

Ya' might want to rethink who exactly is the ignorant one here, Nancy.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-11-01 00:41  

00:00