Submit your comments on this article |
Terror Networks |
Islam Would Die Without Jihad |
2009-11-02 |
Posted by:tipper |
#8 "Islam Would Die Without Jihad" What's the downside? |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2009-11-02 19:19 |
#7 No jihad no islam? Sounds like a win-win to me. |
Posted by: Hellfish 2009-11-02 18:55 |
#6 Wither on the vine, that is. Curiously enough, I have read recently that the Third Reich was also economically dependent on conquest and fresh supplies of loot and slave-labor.Without fresh infusions of loot - they would have caved economically, if they hadn't been collapsed militarily. |
Posted by: Sgt. Mom 2009-11-02 15:01 |
#5 To expand a little on Richard's comment - it appears as if the Caliphate only thrived as long as it had an constant intake of slaves and loot from fresh conquests, and dhimmi's paying disproportionate taxes. When they had conquered all that they could and squeezed it dry, and many of the dhimmis converted (and no longer had to pay jizaya), Western nation-states began to fight back against constant slave-raids - and being no longer able to utilize the skills of the newly conquered (not having internalized any of those skills themselves) - that's when the Islamic world began to wither on the vie. Rather like a shark - it had to keep moving, and continue conquering to survive. |
Posted by: Sgt. Mom 2009-11-02 14:55 |
#4 Islam is the religion of perpetual warfare, without it, it loses it's purpose. |
Posted by: Richard of Oregon 2009-11-02 10:55 |
#3 We love Pepsi, they love death. Let 'em have it. |
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007 2009-11-02 09:46 |
#2 New England Review is the literary journal published by Middlebury College since the late 70s |
Posted by: lord garth 2009-11-02 08:12 |
#1 Human blood is the lifeline of Islam. Without it, Islam would die. Paging Buffy Summers. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2009-11-02 07:43 |