You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
News Corp Sites 'To Be Removed From Google'
2009-11-09
News Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch has suggested the company's online newspaper pages will be invisible to Google users when it launches its new paid content strategy. He claimed that readers who randomly reach a page via an internet search hold little value to advertisers.

When asked by Sky News Australia's political editor David Speers why News Corp has not stopped Google from finding its content, Mr Murdoch replied: "I think we will."

He cited the Wall Street Journal as an example of where only the first paragraph comes up on search engines and is free. Anything after that is subscription-based. He is planning to make newspapers like The Times and Sunday Times chargeable online.

Using the robots.txt protocol on a site indicates to automated web spiders such as Google's not to index that particular page or to serve up links to it in users' search results.

As well as Google, he criticised other sites like Microsoft and Ask.com for also taking a free ride on its content - "the people who just simply pick up everything and run with it - steal our stories ... without payment", he claimed.

He said: "There's not enough advertising in the world to make all the websites profitable. We'd rather have fewer people coming to our websites but paying.

"There are no news websites or blog websites anywhere in the world making any serious money, some may be making breaking even or making a couple of million."

Referring to people finding News Corp stories via search engine websites, he said: "When they click it, they get the page with the story that's in our paper. Who knows who they are or where they are. They don't suddenly become loyal readers of our content."
Certainly not with that attitude ...
He then turned his attention to the BBC, saying it was a "scandal" that everyone with a TV was "compelled" to pay a licence fee. He said although the BBC did not charge for its own online content, it was the taxpayer who was ultimately paying for it.

Earlier in the year, his son, James Murdoch, called for major changes in the way UK broadcasting is run and regulated, and strongly criticised the BBC and TV watchdogs.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#4  Good luck with that. If it's not in Google, it doesn't exist.
Posted by: DMFD   2009-11-09 19:30  

#3  "He is planning to make newspapers like The Times and Sunday Times chargeable online."

Dumb. Really dumb. Would only work if ALL papers did it. Or the Times had a content so terrific and special that people would pay for it (the WSJ is the only paper doing so successfully).

But the Times? They won't. The Guardian and the Telegraph will send Murdoch a bottle of single malt.
Posted by: European Conservative   2009-11-09 17:48  

#2  Murdoch and old media types just do not get it do they? Invisible to Google means Invisible to consumers. He will go broke just like the newspapers.
Posted by: Large Ebbaiting1188   2009-11-09 11:05  

#1  Some days I think Fox News exists because if it didn't there's a danger someone would start a real conservative news network.

Their own search tools are kinda pathetic, in my experience.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2009-11-09 10:20  

00:00