You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Australian & British Prime Minister to apologize to 500,000 Australians
2009-11-15
KEVIN Rudd will apologise today to thousands of Australians shipped from Britain as children with the promise of a better life, only to face abuse and neglect. The Prime Minister will also say sorry to many more thousands of "forgotten Australians" who suffered in orphanages, foster homes and care between the 1930s and 1970s.

Britain sent more than 130,000 poor children to Australia and other former colonies in the last century, many wiithout the knowledge or consent of their parents, according to the charity Child Migrants Trust.

Specialist agencies sent them abroad to populate British colonies with "good white British stock", the charity said, but most ended up in state institutions or farm schools.

Hundreds of former child migrants are expected in Canberra today to hear Mr Rudd's apology. It will cover 500,000 minors placed in care over the 40-year period, including some 7000 sent from Britain and still living in Australia.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is to make his own apology, probably early next year.

"The apology is symbolically very important," Britain's Children's Secretary Ed Balls told Sky News.

It was a "matter of shame" that the "terrible policy" had continued for so long, he added.

"It would never happen today. But I think it is right that as a society when we look back and see things which we now know were morally wrong, that we are willing to say we're sorry."

Compensation battle

Former child migrant Harold Haig will witness the Rudd speech today. "We were told we were orphans and we found out in our '40s, '50s and '60s that was all a lie," he said. "We see the national apology as the first step, but our struggle for compensation will not end."

Compensation schemes exist in Queensland, Western Australia and Tasmania and cases are before the courts in Victoria and NSW. Federal governments allocated more than $1 million to Child Migrant Trust branches in Melbourne and Perth but contributions have now ceased.

Julie Pearson, one of the children who lived in orphanages and institutions, will also be at Parliament House in Canberra to hear Mr Rudd's words, which she hopes will mark the beginning of the healing process.

"It's going to be hard for all of us, but we are finally going to get the apology we deserve - and it means so much to me," Ms Pearson, who was placed in a home during the 1970s, said.
Posted by:Oztralian

#5  Heck,Rudd needs to apologize to all Australians - for being Rudd.
Posted by: Aussie Mike   2009-11-15 22:29  

#4  Probably meant Canada, Sgt. Mom. I can't imagine we'd have taken distressed children in to be servants when we had plenty of our own in orphanages who'd have been happy to have the jobs.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-11-15 22:09  

#3  Next up, Rudd will apologize to all those who were NOT taken from their abusive and neglectful parents.

Crimony. The comments are full of tales of beatings and servitude. This was the way of the world at that time, and many children who grew up with their biological parents experienced the same thing.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2009-11-15 21:51  

#2  From the comments:
"My nan searched her whole adult life for the 2 sisters and brother that were stolen from her family and were 2 shipped off to canada and 1 to America as servants (nice way to say slave) to well to do families."
Ok, when the heck did the Brits send orphans to the US!?
Didn't we have enough orphans of our own by the 20th century - did we really need to import British children? I know there were British evacuees during WWII - but IIRC, they were sent with the consent of their families, and they (the families) really had to pull strings to get their children sent to what was perceived as safety in the US.
This comment struck me as really ... curious. Did Brit social/church services in the late 19th and 20th centuries have a policy of shipping children to the US to be servants!?
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2009-11-15 19:26  

#1  The American experience.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-11-15 18:25  

00:00