You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Afghanistan
U.S. Enlists Allies in New Astan Surge
2009-11-21
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is in advanced talks with its North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies for a coordinated rollout of a new Afghan war strategy, which U.S. officials hope will include a commitment by European allies to send several thousand additional troops.
Our allies must be feeling relief that soon they'll find out what's going on. The Brits have apparently been reduced to begging journalists heading this way to pass on what they find out.
U.S. and European estimates of the new troops they may get from NATO allies vary from 3,000 to 7,000. Those would complement the additional U.S. forces Mr. Obama is considering; those options range from 10,000 to 40,000, but U.S. officials have said a combination of combat troops and training forces totaling 35,000 has gained the most momentum.

Arrangements haven't been finalized, but coordinated announcements of new troops could come as soon as the week of Nov. 30. They are likely to include an address by the NATO secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, shortly after President Barack Obama unveils his strategy.

According to officials familiar with the talks, Mr. Rasmussen would attempt
"Attempt" is an interesting word in this context.
to send a clear signal that the U.S. isn't alone in its plans to confront the Taliban. Officials said that Mr. Obama's review of Afghan strategy and U.S. troop levels, which some had thought would be completed last month, was extended in part to solidify NATO support.
Sure, blame them. Barry's really looking for a bus big enough to throw them under.
NATO foreign ministers are scheduled to meet in Brussels starting Dec. 3, and European diplomats said they expect Mr. Obama to make his announcement ahead of the meeting.

A commitment of as few as 3,000 new troops from allies is sure to strike fear in the heart of the Taliban could be a significant diplomatic coup for the White House, given the way they have trashed Karzai and dithered on following through on the recommendation of the commander on the ground largely fruitless efforts by the Bush administration to get new large-scale commitments from NATO in the waning months of its tenure. The U.S. has 68,000 troops in Afghanistan; other allies have 36,000.
And if they send zip and start withdrawing, will that be a coup for Pelosi and the rest of the donks who want to lose?
Posted by:Nimble Spemble

#1  What war? Hasn't Bambi reclassified this war as a regional outreach disparity reduction action?

Pelosi sucks, but be careful with giving her the position of anti-Afghanistan War. This war if politicized beyond where it is today to become a D's-out, R's-in contest is a no win for conservatives considering Bambi's got the whole wide war in his hands to screw up. And screw it up he will.

Personally, I say burn the whole of Central Asia before you waste one drop of our blood there... and start the fire in Afghanistan. I've got matches if anyone needs them.
Posted by: Phineth Peacock5137   2009-11-21 12:54  

00:00