Submit your comments on this article |
Europe |
Top appointments expose undemocratic nature of EU |
2009-11-23 |
![]() Briton Catherine Ashton was named Thursday as the new EU foreign policy chief, with many critics questioning her foreign policy credentials as a former EU trade commissioner. In a phone interview with Press TV on Sunday, Benn criticized the manner in which the top European Parliament jobs were handed. Although EU membership remains unpopular with a large number of people in the UK, Benn's objection to the bloc stems from democratic concerns rather than nationalistic ones. "Some people object to the European Union on nationalist ground. I don't. My objection is on democratic ground. Europe is run by appointed people, who are not elected, can not be removed, and therefore do not have to listen to the public," he noted. He said that Ashton also had been appointed and not elected, therefore could only push for the EU commission's views and policies, while the policy of individual nations could be ignored. "I don't think it really is a question of qualifications, [but]...how can we have a foreign policy spokesperson, who is not elected by the body? Catherine Ashton has been chosen by the European Commission members, who were all appointed, and she is supposed to talk for the whole of Europe." "What happens if she says something that is contrary to British foreign policy? What happens if she says something that is contrary to, say, German foreign policy? I think it reveals the fundamentally undemocratic nature of the European Union." In order to stressing on the need for fundamental reforms within the EU policymaking body, Benn resorted to a comparison between the EU and the United States. "The difference between the president of the United States, is that he is elected by the American people. The president of European Union is appointed by 27 officials...." "Although Europe is a very powerful body in the world, it has no democratic mechanism for choosing its leaders or deciding its policy," Benn said. Ashton was given the powerful post under a deal at the EU summit on Thursday, with Belgium's Prime Minister Herman Van Rompuy chosen as the EU's first president. Both jobs were created under the Lisbon Treaty, designed to ease policymaking and management of the 27-naion bloc. |
Posted by:Fred |
#7 Harry's the exception that proves the rule... |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2009-11-23 20:51 |
#6 wasnt Harry in Afganastan fighting? |
Posted by: 746 2009-11-23 14:18 |
#5 All a grand reminder why our forefathers either left or were thrown out of the place. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2009-11-23 13:26 |
#4 Europe was never very democratic. The brief flirtation with it made people nervous and they put themselves back in the serf position. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2009-11-23 10:49 |
#3 Well, just as two 'pro-eminent' french examples, think of dominique galouzeau "de villepin", or valérie giscard "d'estaing". Anyway, buying extinct families nobility titles is a long standing republican tradition in France. The Enlightened Elites looooove nobility titles. |
Posted by: anonymous5089 2009-11-23 10:11 |
#2 Titles have been sold to the highest bidder for at least 500 years. The idea of noblemen who had earned respect on the battlefield fighting for their king or prince is positively medieval. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2009-11-23 09:28 |
#1 It used to be that Europe's nobility were wealthy noblemen who had earned respect on the battlefield fighting for their king or prince. Today, the wealthy who aspire to the trappings of nobility are larger varieties of leeches, slugs and nematodes, who having emerged from their tunnels in the polytechnic schools, desire to parasitically attach themselves to the body politic, from which they feed and lay their eggs. |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2009-11-23 09:00 |