You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Brown: Obama economic team has 'turned a corner'
2009-11-23
After coming under fire for advancing policies some say do not do enough to help the middle-class, President Barack Obama's economic team has "turned a corner" on those issues, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said Sunday.

The liberal Brown, who represents a blue-collar state, has pressured the White House to focus more on aiding the manufacturing sector in order to create more middle-class jobs. On Friday, Brown said that he stands behind Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, but sought improvement from the agency on middle-class issues. "I think they've turned a corner," Brown said on CNN's "State of the Union." "The focus next year is all about creating jobs and I think we'll begin to see changes."

Geithner, National Economic Council chairman Larry Summers and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke have come unde fire from conservative congressmen and a growing amount of liberal lawmakers for policies they say heavily favor Wall Street banks instead of the middle-class and small businesses.

Brown appeared to key in on reports that President Barack Obama will use next year's State of the Union address to take on job creation an outline a domestic agenda that focuses on reducing the federal deficit. Brown said that Obama advisers such as manufacturing czar Ron Bloom are starting to have a bigger impact at the White House.

While Brown claimed Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and advisers like Bloom are committed to reviving the slumping manufacturing sector, he said other advisers have yet to come around the issue. "I think the president is. I think the vice president is. I think the advisers are mixed," he said.
Posted by:Fred

#8  The replacement of Scrooge & Marley by a smaller number of bigger private and public employers who treat Bob Cratchit and Tiny Tim better would not necessarily be a tragedy."

Translation:

Are there No Workhouses? Are there no Prisons?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-11-23 19:08  

#7  Hostility to smaller/newer businesses is part and parcel of modern Democrat philosophy, just as eliminating the kulaks was integral to Stalinism. The leftist commentator Michael Lind - near the end of a screed about how opposition to lefty social-welfare schemes was motivated mainly by RAAAAACISM- dropped the following little nugget:

"The costs of such unfunded mandates might drive some small businesses out of existence. But small-business owners are the most vocal opponents of wage and benefit reform in the U.S. The replacement of Scrooge & Marley by a smaller number of bigger private and public employers who treat Bob Cratchit and Tiny Tim better would not necessarily be a tragedy."


Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2009-11-23 17:26  

#6  Punish the investor / entrepreneur classes and watch it die.

AzCat - that's the desired outcome!!!
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-11-23 17:20  

#5  Very true P2K. To go a bit further the most recent data I've seen (a year or two out of date now) claims that 3/4 of all new jobs over the past decade were generated by small businesses and that 85-90% of those were generated by less than 15% of all small businesses. The key mechanism that differentiates the job creators is the need for equity, rather than debt, financing. Encourage risk taking & equity investments & grow the economy. Punish the investor / entrepreneur classes and watch it die.
Posted by: AzCat   2009-11-23 15:52  

#4  The liberal socia!ist Brown, who represents a blue-collar state, has pressured the White House to focus more on aiding the manufacturing sector in order to create more middle-class jobs.

Like the derisive comment of Napoleon that Britain was a nation of shop keepers, America is a nation of small business. Just check who employs who. Focusing on large manufacturers is so 19th-20th Century Marxism. Keeping old state businesses running are a drag on the present Chinese economy. Those centralized operations were not the source of innovation and growth in the expansion of their economy. These are the time to allow the small businesses to find their niche and grow, allowing the large dinosaurs to move on in economic evolutionary history. Policies like this of the statists will not move the economy to improvement except on the cooked balance sheets of self rationalization. Remove the obstructions from the small business to expand and restart employment growth.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-11-23 08:11  

#3  That graphic illustrates perfectly the corner that has been turned.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-11-23 08:02  

#2  Way past that. Just past the P-trap by now.
Posted by: gorb   2009-11-23 03:47  

#1  Hit appendix yet?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-11-23 01:09  

00:00