| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| British yacht crew detained by Iran |
| 2009-12-01 |
| This is not the first diplomatic incident to involve British crew members being taken by Iran. In 2007, 15 British sailors were arrested and detained for 12 days in the Shatt al Arab waterway between Iraq and Iran. And in 2004 eight British servicemen were arrested and accused of spying in the same area. In both cases, the captured sailors were paraded on TV, but eventually pardoned and released by the Iranians, amid tense exchanges between Tehran and London. Since then relations have become even more strained. Iran accused Britain of helping to fuel last summer's street protests. And Britain has kept up the pressure to try to get Iran to freeze its nuclear programme. Only this weekend David Miliband condemned Iran's latest plan to build more uranium enrichment plants. Not an auspicious context for a quick resolution to the incident. Even so, this incident is different. These latest British crew members are not military personnel, but competitive sailors, on their way to take part in a yacht race. They were stopped not in the sensitive disputed region between Iraq and Iran, but lower down in the Persian Gulf. And this time there is no disagreement about what may have happened - everyone seems to agree that they may have mistakenly strayed into Iranian waters. So will Iran release them swiftly? Clearly the Foreign Office hoped this was what would happen if they kept the incident out of the public eye. So far Iran has said nothing publicly and apparently given no clear response through diplomatic channels either. This may be because the Eid holiday has made contact with senior Iranian officials difficult. But the next few days will be critical. Britain's Foreign Secretary David Miliband has let it be known he wants to speak to the Iranian Foreign Minister directly. The ball is in Iran's court. Either Tehran can decide to play the incident down and let the sailors go, or it could turn this into a full blown diplomatic crisis. |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #9 The only question I have is did they put up more of a fight than the British navy? |
| Posted by: regular joe 2009-12-01 15:08 |
| #8 In other news..."neighbor's dog returns again to hen house, eats pullets, runs home with feathers in mouth." |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2009-12-01 12:58 |
| #7 On the radio earlier today there was a suggestion that the keel on the yacht had broken (off?). But it's just as likely that they were grabbed whilst outside of Iranian waters. The Iranians are nobs, after all. |
| Posted by: Bulldog 2009-12-01 12:57 |
| #6 It's entirely likely they were where they were supposed to be. When the Iranians took the boatload of Brit sailors a year or two ago they weren't in Iranian waters, either. Totally Agree with this.UK Govt covered it up not to look soft.Same thing happening again! |
| Posted by: Paul2 2009-12-01 12:49 |
| #5 Bingo Fred. Note the North Korea situation with the journalists captured in china, this sounds the same. Remember we also have some citizens detained in iran. Hikers charged with espionage. |
| Posted by: newc 2009-12-01 11:05 |
| #4 It's entirely likely they were where they were supposed to be. When the Iranians took the boatload of Brit sailors a year or two ago they weren't in Iranian waters, either. |
| Posted by: Fred 2009-12-01 08:01 |
| #3 Idiots. Not surprised idle rich jackoffs thought that international boundaries didn't apply to them. |
| Posted by: gromky 2009-12-01 03:34 |
| #2 only possible excuse is in the strait of Hormuz. pretty congested area, but still. these guys are supposed to be professionals. |
| Posted by: abu do you love 2009-12-01 03:10 |
| #1 I hate to blame the victims here but how do you accidentally go into Iranian waters? Especially after the incident in 2007. I mean really, East coast of the Gulf is hostile, West coast less so. Your destination is on the West Coast. Even without charts I think most boy scouts could manage. Am I missing something? |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2009-12-01 02:02 |